19
submitted 5 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] infinitevalence@discuss.online -5 points 5 months ago

Look I appreciate value and history of socialism, but suggesting that life was good under Soviet rule ignores reality. If you talk to people who lived under it life was so bad that risking death and imprisonment to flee to the west was a worthwhile endeavor. Bread lines existed, famine happened, quality of goods was shockingly bad, violence was how order was maintained, and the idea of free speech and discourse even in ones own home came with great personal risk.

Now, dont think for a second that just because I take issue with remembering the USSR with rose glasses I think things are all rainbows and holding hands in the west throughout history. Capitalism is clearly more destructive to the world. Capitalism created global warming and climate change, it has extracted nearly all wealth and value from people to the extent that most people in the US struggle with basic needs.

Suggesting that authoritarian police states like the USSR are where life was good is a dangerous re-painting of history, as is suggesting that capitalism comes with no risks or costs to humanity. We obviously need something better, but the USSR is not the history lesson we should base our next society on.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

I grew up in Soviet union. Life there was absolutely fine. What you're spewing here is absolute nonsense.

[-] infinitevalence@discuss.online 0 points 5 months ago

I'm really glad that was your experience, for my friends and family who got out and to the west life was measurable worse under the USSR.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago

Your friends and family weren't representative of the majority of the people. The empirical data clearly shows this:

Let's start with some academic studies on USSR

Professor of Economic History, Robert C. Allen, concludes in his study without the 1917 revolution is directly responsible for rapid growth that made the achievements listed above possilbe:

Study demonstrating the steady increase in quality of life during the Soviet period (including under Stalin). Includes the fact that Soviet life expectancy grew faster than any other nation recorded at the time:

A large study using world bank data analyzing the quality of life in Capitalist vs Socialist countries and finds overwhelmingly at similar levels of development with socialism bringing better quality of life:

This study compared capitalist and socialist countries in measures of the physical quality of life (PQL), taking into account the level of economic development.

This study shows that unprecedented mortality crisis struck Eastern Europe during the 1990s, causing around 7 million excess deaths. The first quantitative analysis of the association between deindustrialization and mortality in Eastern Europe.

Next, we can look at how do people who lived under both systems feel now that they got a taste of capitalism?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

I was specifically commenting on some common economic figures I've seen. I'm not into authoritarian governments.

Speaking of experiences though, the systems in the Eastern bloc weren't identical in every country and for everyone. I know people who feel the regime they escaped was hell on earth. I know people who lived well and have been worse off ever since the collapse. This survey from a few years ago provides some insight on people's attitudes in aggregate:

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
19 points (71.1% liked)

Socialism

5182 readers
24 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS