60
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)
United Kingdom
4083 readers
119 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Getting rid of FPTP and doing absolutely anything about immigration rather than just acting like it isn't an issue.
Everything else is secondary.
to be honest I'm kind of amazed that UK voters would fall for the same obvious grift twice
Dumb people will double down in an attempt to present they were always right, even after they admit they were sort of wrong. If they can reverse that previous loss into a win, they were always right.
Yet they aren't going far enough.
People have been so horrifically mislead on this it's unbelievable. It's true immigration as a whole can be "good" (what good is, is debatable) but it also isn't wrong to say that it could be good to reduce immigration. Not all immigration is the same and not all amount are the same, grouping it together messes the whole thing up. The purpose of immigration as it is now now is to keep wages down and keep houses prices up.
Do you really care about GDP do you even really care about GDP per capita? Probably not but those figures are used to woo you. What's better having a GDP per capita of 50,000 and rent of 40,000 or having a GDP per capita of 30,000 and having rent of 10,000? With lower rents people have more discretionary income and they can go out spend more, grow the economy and it will create growth. Everyone wins. Currently all our money is going to landowners and business owners. Immigration is for them not for us. So you say we need more X workers. Okay pay people enough to do it. They aren't trained? Pay for training it's not hard it just costs money. It's not like the UK is at 100% employment rate people want to work but can't. It's cheaper to get immigrants to do it, but its bad for the UK.
Look at Japan low immigration, low house costs, low crime. They manage to fill their jobs. Yet Japan is doing something wrong?
Let's get some facts and figures. Here is an article about UK losing money to immigration.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/05/08/migration-failed-economic-growth-made-housing-crisis-worse/
Here is Danish data on crime.
https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-effects-of-immigration-in-denmark
Why are we taking in people that are taking British people jobs costing the country money and committing more crimes than locals?
I voted remain, I'm happy to have immigration. But what it is now and what it is used for is wrong. You really think net migration of over half a million people per year is good? Why is that happening?
That's not even to mention the cultural aspect. I love Britain and I love how it is. But I am also very well travelled and the place I most felt like an outsider and been stared like I don't belong is within the UK. Why are we doing that to ourselves? If we take a financial hit to train our workforce, give them jobs and keep our culture I'm happy to do it. Give us the choice. But I actually think financially the people will be better off at the expense of the upper class. They why we don't get to choose.
Whatever happened then doesn't mean we don't have issues now.
If you want to get rid of first pass in the post there are less repugnant parties than Reform. Especially considering the fact that their only MP got in the position because he was too racist for the Tories and he was only in the Tories because he got kicked out of Labour.
So their one main representative is a man who has no morals and cannot be trusted to tell you the colour of the sky with any degree reliability.
I said this the other day and I'll say it again because it's a point that people such as yourself seem unable to gork. If they win, they will win under first pass the post, instantly removing any incentive they would have to get rid of it. Given their tendency to lie in order to get what they want, I would be extremely skeptical of anything they promise.
You comment is entirely based on the assumption I think voting for Reform will lead to reform being in power.
Farage is a slimeball but, like it or not, he is one of the most influential British politicians of our time. I hated him for Brexit but when it cones to FPTP and reducing immigration Reform clearly stands out as the party that is most likely to cause an change in those issues. I don't think they will manage it themselves but voting for then shows what people care about and it continues to raise awareness. Voting for Green sounds like a vote more for green policies (which I am all for but I think the momentum is underway and there is no stopping it). Why would I vote libdem? I could vote Plaid which is closer to my left leaning views but I think we need more of a UK wide focus on immigration.
Who else should I vote for or what have I missed?
A man who has never once won a political position is an influential politician now is he? Lord save me from armchair political pundits. He's not influential, he's just scary to the conservatives, who by the way are not going to be in power anymore so he's going to lose any kind of authority that you perceive him to have had.
Labour are way more likely to listen to anything the greens have to say. Reform won't be scary to labour because they're not going to lose votes to them.
But feel free to go vote for the racist party and if they gain any MPs it will be your fault.
Brexit is the biggest thing to have happened to the UK in recent history.
You think that would have happened without him?
Like I said he's threatening to the conservatives he isn't politically relevant overall.
If those are your main issues, how are they any different from greens or libdems?
They have fewer of those scary foreign looking people
I have voted green before but I don't think they care enough about immigration. I think the economic boom in green energy means that the landslide to green power is already underway and effort should be spent in other areas. No one is really going to slow or speed up the green revolution from a global point of view, which is frankly all that matters?
Why would I vote for libdem?
Because they want to get rid of FPTP and fix immigration, your main two important issues. But it seems like you're adding extra steps now..
Anyways, reading your other comments here, you've confirmed what others already suspected - you don't really want to fix the root issues of immigration, you're just a xenophob.
I'm not adding extra steps at all. I want a party that will do something about immigration and voting. Reform seem the loudest in that space so they are likely to get my vote.
You are the one trying to convince me to vote libdem and I don't see what they offer. The party has never interested me and I don't see why I would vote for them. So if you can't give me a reason to choose then over reform I don't see why you would bring it up.
I don't know if it's your reading comprehension or you're just confused, but I urge you to re-read my comments - I'm not trying to convince you of anything, you clearly made your decision and it doesn't seem to be based on any empirical evidence.
You made some bold claims though and I'm here to challenge you on those.
So my answer is this... If you vote Reform, you're not a leftie. If you vote Farage, you're not a Remainer either. There are other parties who want to reform voting and immigration with better track record, actual councillors and more humane policies.
Well what makes someone a leftie? Because it seems we have different views on what that is and I'm letting you lay down the groundwork on that. I don't mean parties I mean as a concept. What cote views make someone left vs right?
Sure if you vote for a right party then I can see how that by definition can make you right. So if I vote right then yes I will be for the first time in my life right. (All other times I voted for a left party and I think my core right/left views are left. Just few exceptional views could override others and make me vote for a party that holds views I don't agree with).
In the Brexit vote I voted remain. What more can i say?
I didn't say reform hit all the boxes. You tried to convince me to vote for someone else and I asked why I should vote for them.
I voted for other left leaning parties in the past because of voting reform issues. As for immigration I think reform are talking about it more and the publicity on the issue is bigger. Therefore voting for reform does more for the immigration issue than any other.
I'm really struggling to understand what you don't get.