We’re literally having this conversation because you just can’t accept that not all men deserve to be placed in your generalisation that men = bad.

We are literally having this conversation because you're hyperdefensive and equate women being cautious of and scared of men with them thinking men are bad.

I'm guessing you'd be scared of a bear, do you think bears are evil? Do you hate bears?

Say you pick the bear because of the bad ones out there, and not because no man is trustworthy.

Literally no one is saying that, you're shadowboxing.

That will at least clarify that it’s an argument from emotions and not logic, since if you try to break it down statistically this stops making rational sense.

It literally is from logic that you refuse to understand.

Everything I asked, since my first comment, was to stop generalising. Why is this so offensive to you that you had to go this far?

You still don't get that the issue is that you're claiming it is generalization when the issue is that women aren't fucking mindreaders and men often conceal their motives and blend in with more benign men. You have to be cautious around men because you don't know what you're getting.

You’re basically proving my point that you’re only listening to yourself and have no empathy for the 9/10 other innocent guys you lump together with your generalising.

Oh, no, I bet it has to be really hard being viewed with distrust because men as a whole behave badly. The problem is that that feeling doesn't permit you to tell women that they should stop being cautious and that their fears are unreasonable.