1189
Oxygen
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
1189 points (97.6% liked)
Atheist Memes
5595 readers
12 users here now
About
A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.
Rules
-
No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.
-
No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.
-
No bigotry.
-
Attack ideas not people.
-
Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.
-
No False Reporting
-
NSFW posts must be marked as such.
Resources
International Suicide Hotlines
Non Religious Organizations
Freedom From Religion Foundation
Ex-theist Communities
Other Similar Communities
!religiouscringe@midwest.social
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm asking how it's going to react with stuff. In like a basic chemistry kind of way.
Seems like something a hazmat DOT fleet manager would already know though, so I guess I just don't know why you're asking that. And truthfully, I don't particularly care, as, again, I fail to see the relevance. I mean like, if it's real chemical kinetic information that you're after, there are innumerable better sources than the comments section of a meme page on a fringe social media platform. If you're trying to make a point about my original tongue-in-cheek comparison, feel free to make it.
Ok. You can just accept you're wrong rather than double downing and sounding less educated than you originally did.
Mmm yes, because "double downing" is a phrase an educated person uses. Got it, lolol.
Look, I would totally accept that I was wrong if I knew what you were referring to, but I literally don't know, you haven't explained your opinion at all. Like, please! Tell me what you mean! What am I wrong about?
Like totally. Because educated people don't know modern lingo or anything. No cap. Your argument is so mid.
At least I gave one, even if it was sarcastic. Once again, all you offer is non sequiturs and haughty derision. I guess I just want to know what you think this discussion is about, because all I've gotten out of it is vacuous meta-argument trollery.
Blah blah blah. You can't accept that you don't have a single point and just keep yammering on. I'm not even reading your response.
Lololol it started with my single point and then you changed the subject so you could...flex your in-depth chemistry knowledge on me I guess? But without actually making any salient point, so I'm left, as you say, yammering on to what is essentially a brick wall.
No. Oxygen doesn't react to itself in a sealed vessel. But I guess you aren't smart enough to put those duplos together on your own. So good luck.
"No" what? I didn't ask you any yes or no questions, I asked you to relate whatever the hell it is you're talking about to what I was talking about, which you have failed to do yet again. And you're a liar, you said you weren't gonna read this.