388
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WFloyd@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I used to frequent the FOSSCAD IRC ages back as a teen. This started during the post-Liberator panic, there were talks about regulating 3D printers to not allow printing guns, etc. Designed a few things, never actually printed any of it myself, but some others did. Really got me into engineering before I exited the scene, led to actually pursuing an engineering career. Was surprised to see 3D printed gun videos so openly shared, it was pretty underground for ages there.

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I used to run the 3D printing community on G+ at around 500k strong, (about 10k weekly active users according to Google's stats) and I ended up actually pissing off a lot of my European users because of this. My viewpoint on it, was as an engineering exercise -- it's an amazing thing. It's not advocating for guns, and guns aren't only used to kill other people. So I stood up for the guys posting about their engineering challenges, and their work making 3D printed parts for a machine with high impact loads and loads of cycling issues.

Unfortunately, it lost me some friends, like Gina Haubage and Tomas Sanladerer -- as they disagreed highly; and wanted to ban anyone posting firearms related 3D printing content.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

there is probably no point in fighting this sort of thing, but i wish we would engineer something else instead

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Projectiles are a part of human nature. We've always thrown spears, rocks, etc -- firearms are just an extension of our better understanding of the world. I know of barely anything else that uses explosive charges that is as widely applicable to the general public. Roofing nail guns? But that's such a niche subject, it's not something people are really worried about trying to make with 3D printing. Believe me, if I had a better engineering challenge for 3D printing, I'd be suggesting it. But nothing quite hits like containing an explosive charge, and utilizing the energy in a way that performs work without destroying itself.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

camera gear? experimental musical instruments? i think an idiot could make a list of things that aren't guns and don't suck

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Things that "don't suck" are far away from peak exciting.

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Did you miss the qualifier "that uses explosive charges"? The engineering challenge is in the explosive part.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago
[-] WFloyd@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Absolutely, it's a fabulous engineering challenge, to make it work well on a hobbyist grade 3D printer with ordinary materials. Also a lesson in using the right tool for the right job (some parts are just better off milled or bought OtS)

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
388 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
4019 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS