428
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago

The only thing that's clear about this conversation is that you engaged on a topic you know almost nothing about beyond some cursory googling. Go actually read Chomsky on this. Then read the follow ups. Then read Elman, and Fisher, and Vernes. I'd say to also read Sampson but he's a racist fuck nugget, so fuck that guy.

You should actually read Chomsky before commenting any further, because its very very clear you haven't. UG as a theory is relegated to pseudoscience, and Chomsky did a disservice to the entire field pushing theory that had been demonstrated to be false, repeatedly. Even that NYT op-ed was the same pushing of his wrong theories, which were baseless. His preeminence in the field prevented forced research into an unfounded and wrong direction for five decades.

[-] yeahiknow3 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That doesn’t sound like “thank you.” Regardless, feel free to adopt some version of the syllogism above, so that you can have more honest conversations with people in the future. Clarity is important if you’re interested in getting to the truth. It’s a shame we wasted so much time and now can no longer debate the actual premises of your dumb argument. That’s the fun part, after all.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago

Like I said, the only thing clear in this conversation is that you know actually nothing about anything in it. You don't know what Chomsky is saying because you haven't read him. You are stuck in this weird little self sucking loop where you think you are making a point, but you aren't. You don't know Chomsky, you don't know language, language theory, or computer science. You should just be apologizing for your ignorance and saying that you'll do the work to be taken seriously next time.

The only thing here that's a shame is you.

[-] yeahiknow3 3 points 6 months ago

Your responses are so unhinged. Is your ego that fragile? What’s the point? Why not just learn from your mistake and do better next time?

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
428 points (98.2% liked)

Philosophy

1258 readers
1 users here now

Discussion of philosophy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS