If the ideal setup is many medium sized instances rather than a few huge ones, wouldn't that mean users would need to subscribe to duplicate communities in all of those instances? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by spiritedpause@sh.itjust.works to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Otherwise, if we have a lot of medium sized instances but the most popular communities are hosted on just a few huge instances, doesn't that defeat the purpose of distributing load across many instances?

If that's the case, how do we solve the cumbersome user experience of having to subscribe to the same community over and over again across a ton of medium instances?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It gets copied to the existing community as well (and every instance it's federated with).

So the real consideration is that large communities are heavy on storage for any instance with a user that uses it. Ideally there are lots of small communities and instances so nothing gets too much traffic.

[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting, thanks for the clarification.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023

67 points (94.7% liked)

Lemmy

11947 readers

3 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

nutomic@lemmy.ml