352
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 43 points 4 months ago

They oppose bans on care. But a slight majority thinks it's wrong to transition.

I think that's what you're looking for. They don't want to do it, but don't want to ban anyone who's doing it.

[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

The title could've been more clear, thanks for providing that clarification

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah I'm glad everyone else was confused, too. I felt like the dumb one for thinking it was the opposite.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

“But a slight majority thinks it's wrong to transition.”

Looks like someone forgot what freedom was about and needs to be educated on it.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 months ago

I think the people surveyed agree with you here. They're saying that they're opposed to the surgery, but they don't want to ban the surgeries even though they oppose them.

[-] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 17 points 4 months ago

Minors aren't getting any surgeries.

Gender affirming care for trans kids involves seeing psychiatrists, social transitioning, and, if they're lucky, puberty blockers till they're old enough to decide whether they want to medically and surgically transition.

[-] match@pawb.social 19 points 4 months ago
[-] die444die@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

And that’s a completely different issue that’s totally separate from the anti trans laws being pushed by the right wing today.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

You didn't get their point. The only children who are getting gender reassignment surgery are the ones who right wing doctors are trying to assign a gender to, despite medical consensus that it's unnecessary, he's calling the right wing misinformed and hypocritical

[-] die444die@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I agree with what you are saying here, I’m just not sure that was the previous posters point.

It may have been, but it reads to me like they are just saying “nuh uh” to the person above them.

[-] match@pawb.social 1 points 4 months ago

volodya_ilich is correct! but also I think it would be useful to use this energy on both sides to prevent gender assignment surgeries on infants (even if the right does not realize the context?)

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

I am aware. I wasn't in the survey

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

They need to be informed that surgery alleviates gender dysphoria and saves tens of thousands in the long run from poor mental health to lessen productivity.

The healthcare system should cover every gender affirming care surgery available.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Don't accept their definition shifting. They wrap surgery into "gender affirming care" then say young children get GAC to make people think they're regularly performing surgery on 12 year olds. Hormone blockers are GAC too.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

I know. I wasn't in the survey

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

There are many misconceptions here. For instance, a sizeable fraction of the public believes that minors receive a sex-change surgery (they don’t) as opposed to just medication and therapy. I think most people are mostly worried that it is easy to transition and kids might do it without considering the consequences. These myths could be easily dispelled if they actually talk to transgenders.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Good point but please say transgender people instead as transgender is an adjective.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
352 points (93.6% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4183 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS