428
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 285 points 4 months ago

Regardless of whether or not the parents were around the ability for a body to be forcibly pulled into the machinery is an obvious failure in operating a safe pool.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 150 points 4 months ago

It's a failure on a number of levels, failure to maintain a safe pool, AND failure to maintain a safe working environment.

And honestly the employee refusing to review security footage until the police showed up when a child was missing with the fuck?

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 93 points 4 months ago

The kind of employee that asks "is this right for the company" before doing anything.

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago

Yeah maybe but it could also be someone desparate in a shitty low pay job who is afraid of getting fired. Just saying, not enough info

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

That just sounds like "I was only following orders!" a child is missing FFS, look at the footage and fuck the corporation.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 14 points 4 months ago

Yeah, even if you're half starved and are certain the company will retaliate... That's still a little child. You've got to take the hit.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

Tbh I'd want to avoid being traumatised too

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 43 points 4 months ago

This has been a known problem for decades. I remember watching videos about it on Discovery channel back when they still ran education content. One case, a person had their intestines sucked out.

The solution has always been to have multiple intakes for the suction line and have the kill switch in clear view of the pool.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago

Newer pools have the water intake all around the pool rather than a suction valve at the bottom/side.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

You can also retrofit old pools with a wider, domed intake screens.

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

right? thats all this takes.

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Did you read the one where a guy stuck is weiner in a pipe and it got stuck and then engorged.

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The delta-p videos are wild. The most popular being a crab sucked through a crack in a pipe, not a hole, but a crack no more than mm or two wide.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I saw that on one of the Final Destination movies. I had no idea it could actually happen.

[-] bcgm3@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You can say that again. Growing up in Florida, I've been in a lot of swimming pools and water parks, and I have never seen anything like what is shown in the video attached to this article. That opening is huge. user224's link says the pipe is 30cm (almost a foot) in diameter. Even in giant public pools I've been in, I can't recall seeing an opening or fixture that size. That, coupled with a lack of any cover on it, seems so obviously dangerous. God, what an awful way to go.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Seems like litigation is still ongoing but most recent articles I've read state that pump was either recently repaired or replaced, and flow was in the wrong direction. If it was outflow, nobody could swim in there if they wanted to (but if it was off, a small child still could, so a grate still should've been on there). They suspect hole was installed later to probably align with flow requirements for the new pump.

[-] Hobbes@startrek.website 8 points 4 months ago

My submechaniphobia is at an 11 right now, and this further confirms for me that's it's not really a phobia but a real legit fear.

Delta P: https://youtu.be/AEtbFm_CjE0?si=OYBw9OAxFPgxAM2m

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 4 months ago

I found more info here (news.com.au).
Also shows image of the pipe and:

“[It] appears right now the pump was put in there, and it was probably malfunctioning because of the open pipe that she ended up in was supposed to be pushing water out.”

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Fuck sake that was a hard read. That poor mother. I can't even comprehend the purpose of that pipe. They describe it as a lazy river so I'm assuming it's some sort of equalizer pipe to the other side. Water flows in one direction around the pool and I think what they're saying is the flow of the river was reversed for whatever reason. There would be quite a strong amount of suction through there, even if it wasn't a direct intake line to the pump.

Edit: oh this is old news, months old. Looks like it was indeed an outlet:

“Her poor little body was contorted when she was sucked into this hole and pipe 20 feet back. Her body was inside of the motor when she had to be extracted," he said. "They had to break up concrete in order to extract her, cut pipe. It was absolutely horrific.”

Pump's flow was reversed for whatever reason.

Elsewhere I read the pump actually did have an entrapment system engaged and shut off, but by the time she blocked the pipe and sensors detected the obstruction, she was already wedged 20 feet into the pipe.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
428 points (97.8% liked)

News

23259 readers
3367 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS