175
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ah, your source is just your precious fee fees.

Classic boomer move right there.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 1 points 4 months ago

Generally CA does not fuck with the homeless as far as I know, but there was one very obvious and glaring exception:

https://www.newsweek.com/gavin-newsom-slammed-cleaning-san-francisco-1843412

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

San Diego has also passed a camping ban and has been violently clearing homeless camps

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

In San Diego they passed a camping ban last year, I've been protesting it since then. The Union Tribune probably.has some news stories, but they absolutely have been doing it, and I don't have a subscription.

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But is it mostly blue states?

I recognize that blue states do occasionally pass anti homeless laws.

But are mostly blue states passing anti homeless laws?

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No clue. I have been focused on California since 2016. In my experience it is easier to enact local change, to influence state level changes, and later federal changes. I'm not really focusing on anything but my local city council meetings, and the various elections, especially judges, city council, and school board. Other than that I pay attention to my representatives / assemblymen, and senators at both the state and federal level. I do pay some attention to the presidential race, but as a leftist I have to hold my nose and vote for the milquetoast democratic candidate every single time for the last 5 presidential elections, and probably the 6th time in my life in November. Not one presidential candidate that I voted for in the primaries has ever gotten the nomination.

The case in question, namely Grant's Pass vs Johnson, originated in an Oregon town. Another blue state.

TBH I wouldn't be at all surprised if most of these recent laws come from Washington, California, and Oregon. They have the worst homelessness problems, and that's partially due to the fact that all three states have historically had robust social safety nets, so it was safer to be homeless on the west coast.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
175 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3466 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS