68
submitted 2 months ago by eris@lemm.ee to c/collapse@lemm.ee
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

It's pretty ironic to do it in a decision where SCOTUS decided that the courts know better than the experts and don't have to listen to them.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Think you're mixing up this case with Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo.

This case was just about a stay being granted pending a petition for review in a lower court. They lost because they were required to issue an explanation of their reasoning for an interpretation and hadn't.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
68 points (98.6% liked)

Collapse

263 readers
68 users here now

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.


Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.


RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort, high volume and low relevance posts.


Related lemmys:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS