152
submitted 4 months ago by Kwakigra@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

Speaks for itself. We've been beyond satire for a long time but this one still got me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] galoisghost@aussie.zone 8 points 4 months ago

The should just be honest:

“Yes this is bad, but we might want to use this power ourselves so we won’t do anything to reverse it. You just need to vote so only WE have the power to use it.”

Honest question: What should democrats do to reverse the Supreme Court?

[-] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 months ago

Kill or forcibly resign everyone on the Supreme court who voted in favor of the decision, appoint new justices, and have it overturned.

More realistically? Add more members to the Court so they're the majority and then overturn it.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

More realistically? Add more members to the Court so they're the majority and then overturn it.

This will at best take a LOT of time. Congress is not famous for their speed.

At the worst it is politically impossible.

So how is this realistic?

What you said first can probably be done, even if it does break the democratic norms. This latter option seems unrealistic to me.

Bare minimum Biden needs to declare a state of emergency, a Constitutional crisis, and talk to us on TV about what his administration is doing to handle the crisis firmly and expeditiously. Anything less is irresponsible.

The people in Biden's admin are smarter than myself. All my simpleminded self can think of is using the power of the official acts against the SCOTUS itself. If Biden's White House has better ideas, get on TV right now, and tell us what they are and what is the White House doing about SCOTUS and the nearly unlimited expansion of the presidential powers.

Pretending we aren't in a Constitutional crisis right now is political malpractice.

This isn't business as usual, President Biden.

[-] araneae@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago

99% of democracies give up right before hitting it big and concentrating supreme power in the hands of a benevolent dictator.

Examine this change of logic. The democrats want a mandate from the people before they act antidemocratically? So that they can maintain the highground when they do an inherently lowdown thing? And they could do it now but they want a blue election first? Are you a snake eating its own tail?

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
152 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10179 readers
89 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS