690
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Lol, I haven’t taken a side

I just pointed out a bias and that there isn’t enough information for anyone to take a side

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

we tend to show bias towards the victims. even if those women started it, they shouldn't have been beaten... by men. if you're a man, you don't touch a woman unless it's self defense.

you really come off as some kind of edgy teen douche. are you an edgy teen douche?

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

That guy is a troll, and he's not even good at it. The faux high road crap is giving him away.

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The faux high road crap

because it's impossible that someone in the 21st century has actual morals? you people are fucked.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I was talking about the dude siding with the guys who beat up two women. Hes a troll. Sorry for not being more clear on that... I just didn't want to tag him and give him more attention.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

We don’t know who the victim is

All we know is the woman claims to be the victim and the men claim to be the victim

you don’t touch a woman unless it’s self defense.

Equality, you don’t touch anyone unless it’s self defence

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

the victim is the WOMAN, how was beaten mercilessly by a GROUP OF MEN. jesus christ, people. only in a morally bankrupt society would this even be a question.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

Weird then that you would advocate this

i’d ship every person that insists on their religion over science to some hellhole to rot away. building a better world now saves future generations form suffering. the payoff is immeasurable.

When presumably some of those people would be women

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

women aren't a fey creature that is innately good.

also, i don't see a long term solution for humanity that doesn't involve cracking a few eggs to make an omelet. it's a simple trolley dilemma.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

women aren’t a fey creature that is innately good.

But wasn’t that your argument?

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

no, it wasn't. feel free to ask me any question that would clarify my stance for you.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

women started it, they shouldn’t have been beaten… by men. if you’re a man, you don’t touch a woman unless it’s self defense.

the victim is the WOMAN, how was beaten mercilessly by a GROUP OF MEN

Why would you highlight their gender? If not to say they deserve elevated status

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

they deserve to not be bullied by an opponent who is physically more powerful than they are. good god, dude. do i seriously have to explain this concept? there's a reason why you're not supposed to hit a woman.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

women aren’t a fey creature that is innately good.

also, i don’t see a long term solution for humanity that doesn’t involve cracking a few eggs to make an omelet. it’s a simple trolley dilemma.

How does that align with this?

there’s a reason why you’re not supposed to hit a woman.

Says who? You just come off as extremely sexist. The line is “don’t hit PEOPLE”

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

well, at the risk of turning you away from understanding my point, i've decided that i'd like to hurl insults back: you come off as extremely short sighted and obtuse.

i agree with "don't hit people", but if you think a woman hitting you justifies you hitting her back and you're male, you're a piece of shit. restrain? sure. defend your own life by any means necessary? sure. but if your ego can't take getting slapped by a woman, you might be a fucking incel.

progressive and gentleman are not exclusive concepts. gender is asymmetrical balanced. men and women are not perfectly equal. they are asymmetrically equal. understand the difference, and understand that if i see you hit a woman in retaliation, i'm going to remove some of your teeth, punk.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

You’re drawing lines where there is no need to have them

woman hitting you justifies you hitting her back and you’re male,

Just blatant sexism, an equal amount of force is going to dependent on you size and strength not your gender

You are assuming a man will always be stronger than a woman

Past thar though you already established you don’t believe it needs to only be in self defence as you argue for rounding up and exiling people

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

obviously there are exceptions to every rule. if big bertha comes at me with a giant ham fist, she might get hit back, but in the vast majority of cases, the male is physically dominant and therefore has a duty to use that power responsibly.

and yes, i advocate rounding up and exiling people that stand as obstacles to a better world. what's your solution?

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
690 points (98.2% liked)

News

23655 readers
2930 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS