690
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

So maybe the issue isn't religion or the absence there of, but that shitty people will find excuses to justify their shittyness. That would make focusing on religion a waste of time.

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

so then what do you focus on as a cure for humanity?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -3 points 5 months ago

Laws, enforcement (what's being asked for here), and education.

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

laws based on what? what kind of education? how do we achieve reasonable laws and enforcement?

my point is that we both advocate for humanity. the path is see towards that is a secular one. most of the obstacles to what we want are based in religion.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

The obstacle I'm seeing is the police not doing their job. They've already talked to one of the assailants, they know who they are, and have done nothing. Let's start there.

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

yeah, fuck the police.

but i'm telling you, we are looking at the symptoms instead of the disease.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

Are you claiming secular bigots don't exist?

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

Then the root cause of the symptoms isn't religion, is it? Seeing as it affects secular people as well.

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

which one is more likely to cause bigotry?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

Sounds like bigotry exists in both, the origins must be something else.

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

you're taking an outlier: a bigoted secularist; and equating it with the norm of religious bigotry. i just don't understand why you would pick this hill to die on. methinks you might have an ulterior motive.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

you’re taking an outlier: a bigoted secularist; and equating it with the norm of religious bigotry.

I'm going to take a page for your book and ask for a source on that. What is the difference in bigotry between religious and secular people?

methinks you might have an ulterior motive.

Me thinks thou dost protest too much. You've taken a article about bigotry, that doesn't mention religion a single time, and used it as your soapbox to declare all religion should be banned. I'm not the one with the ulterior motive here, and I'm just pointing that out.

[-] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

23% of non-religious/secular Americans said that they viewed the predicated changing racial and ethnic demographics as a bad thing.

Holy shit, 23% of secular Americans are bigots. That sure as fuck isn't an outlier, it's 1 in 4 people. Find 3 other secular people, one of you is a bigot. Why are you proposing a solution that ignores roughly 20 million bigots? (Population of 334,914,895, roughly 28% are secular, roughly 23% of those are bigots).

I'm starting to suspect bigotry is not your main focus of concern here.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
690 points (98.2% liked)

News

23649 readers
3139 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS