this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
973 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

69913 readers
2245 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 41 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I love this kind of shit. Building things for the sake of it is worth it. Not only as just expression, which may be hubris but it's still expression. Also entertainment, inspiration, pushing the art of engineering, and just giving people something to do, and all the good that comes with that like personal and trade growth.

A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 84 points 10 months ago (3 children)

We can do that, but first let’s make sure everyone on the planet has clean water first.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 17 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The money spent on this would not have been spent on giving clean water to people thousands of miles away

[–] dandi8@fedia.io 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does this really make it any less worthy of criticism, though...?

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Is that where guillotines come in?

[–] nikita@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Maybe it would’ve if governments taxed them properly and spent that money to save the planet

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Doesn’t flint still not have clean water?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So we might a well build some shit.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Hey, it's just $2,300,000,000

Can't even feed a packed homeless shelter for that much ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

This is the equivalent of saying “Eat all your dinner cause there’s starving children in Africa”.

Sure, this sounds nice, but this logic falls apart the instant you start thinking about it.

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You sound like the people criticising NASA for spending money on science. "Who do X when Y is still an issue?"

I doubt you make that kind of prioritization with your own money.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

NASA also consistently provides new innovation and new science.

What will the dome keep contributing to society for the absurd electricity cost it takes to keep running? Advertisements?

Yeah, there not really the same argument.

[–] rasensprenger@feddit.org 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I understand that perspective, but does it really have to be advertising?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

I'd prefer if it weren't. Though that's not the only use for this thing.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This isn't pushing any boundaries, though. This is off the shelf technology. Anybody can do something big by throwing a shit ton of money at it. It would be pushing boundaries of tech or art if it was for instance super power efficient, or mind bending in any way. This is a fucking sphere, it's the simplest shape and a rip off of the pyramids but less original and not even comparable in terms of durability.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

It is absolutely pushing boundaries to be driving this many pixels at a frame rate that doesn't take minutes to refresh. I build a lot of projects with addressable LEDs and the typical hobbyist stuff chokes out when you start trying to control more than a thousand or so. This thing has 256 million pixels inside and 1.2 million outside.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Could it not be argued that building this thing now gives people a chance at looking at the power draw and attempting to make it super efficient? Like now people have a tool to test things on.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

They did mention that they are working on making 70% of this powered by solar panels. Maybe this will push forward solar technology in some way.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure but we’re burning tons of coal to have this thing advertise minion movies, not anything artistic or worthwhile.

load more comments (1 replies)