260
submitted 4 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] classic@fedia.io 50 points 4 months ago

I'm not clear what the dirty little secret is supposed to be. That it doesn't poll well? That it's written by Trump associates (and therefore ofc Trump knows about it)?

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 20 points 4 months ago
[-] classic@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

I think I was thrown off because that's been in the news cycle for a while now. So I assumed they were introducing something new

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Cory Doctorow mentioned another interesting 'secret' in there, namely that the policies it's unsure about each represent fracture lines in which two groups of R voters want conflicting things. Highlighting these divisions could let those groups know that they might be getting the opposite of what they voted for.

[-] classic@fedia.io 8 points 4 months ago

Interesting. This might be the article you're referring to? Going to give it a read

https://pluralistic.net/2024/07/14/fracture-lines/#disassembly-manual

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That's the one, referencing https://prospect.org/politics/2024-07-10-project-2025-republican-presidencies-tradition/

"The fact that conservatives have been trying so hard for so long is what makes it more dangerous. It’s our good luck that each time, some accident of history stood in the way of the worst right-wing plans. The Great Depression prevented Project 1921. Phew. But not a good accident! Better for us to nip this thing in the bud on our own. And that takes a deeper understanding of antecedents."

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In other words, “81% of the document’s creators held formal roles in Trump’s presidency.”

It’s very unlikely that he has “no idea who is behind it.”

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
260 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3390 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS