800
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Old, but seems relevant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

It’s only ok to incite violence when we do it.

Wasn't the guy who shot Trump a registered Republican?

Is it possible that he was incited to violence by... other Republicans?

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

"By the way, and if she gets to pick --if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know. But I'll tell you what, that will be a horrible day, if -- if -- Hillary gets to put her judges in."

-Donald Trump, Wilmington, N.C., Aug. 9, 2016

Since then we know Trump's suggested method of dealing with legally unchangeable judge positioning.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Yep. And confirmed conservative, if recent headlines are to be trusted.

We pretending like every thread on Lemmy wasn’t filled with “wish he had better aim” sentiment?

[-] Weslee@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

In most the posts I saw, the comments wishing he had been killed were downvoted.

So yeah, some people made those comments, but most people didn't agree with them

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I don’t have time to go look right now but when I went through the threads that was very much not the case.

[-] Kolrami@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That hasn't been my experience in any thread that I've seen.

I decided to look for examples of threads and most had neutral comments and some comments agreeing with my memory events.

This archived thread was the most blatant one I found.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

When both teams suck, all you can do is root for injuries. But no, "I wish you'd just die already" is not a call to violence.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I remember you from the other thread. You’re a fan of feigning ignorance if it helps your point.

Read this thread. The people encouraging violence are upvoted far more and those discouraging it are downvoted.

It’s not just that thread either.

To continue a theme from our previous thread - you mind if we quit playing stupid?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

The people encouraging violence are upvoted

The top five root comments have no such thing.

[-] Kolrami@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Maybe your app is displaying them differently, but when I looked the 3rd highest top-level comment wanted the guy to have better aim and it had 49 net upvotes

https://archive.is/uNswh

I'm archiving so you see the same layout I saw.

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
800 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3810 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS