224
Nuclear too slow to replace coal, and baseload “simply can’t compete” with wind and solar, AEMO boss says (reneweconomy.com.au)
submitted 5 months ago by phneutral@feddit.org to c/energy@slrpnk.net
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I would disagree. Take a look at airplanes for instance. Good safety policy measures and enforcement can make seemingly high risk operations incredibly safe. Take a look at French nuclear reactors for example. Good nuclear safety policies, hence no accidents.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Take a look at airplanes for instance.

Those things that Boeing builds?

[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Less people die on airplanes than other modes of transport. So yeah, that's the level of safety despite Boeing's bullshit.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Less people travel by planes than other modes of transport.

If you look unitary numbers, planes in general are safer than most things, not by any absurd margin. And Boeing has more than one model that just isn't safer than most things.

That should show you how bad management can destroy any kind of safety policy. But I guess it won't, not by fault of the facts.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
224 points (94.4% liked)

Green Energy

2283 readers
18 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net