58
submitted 4 months ago by zephyreks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago

And Biden did not go back to the deal. Both Biden and Trump serve Israel

[-] homura1650@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Biden tried to restart the deal back in 2021, and has been trying ever since.

However, it turns out that the US is not the only party involved in international treaties. We can't just pick up the ball and go home mid game, then come back in a year with a new coach and expect everyone to continue playing like nothing happened

The original deal was a difficult achievement on its own. Now, we need to not only repeat that, but also deal with the fact that Iran does not trust us to follow through with our end of the deal. Overcoming that needs good negotiation, and a lot of concessions we did not want to make.

This is why administrations of both parties have historically upheld deals made by the opposing party that they didn't like. Unilaterally breaking deals every 4 years because of who wins an election makes the US a non-credible partner in negotiations. You can't just wave a wand and fix that.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 10 points 4 months ago

Biden did not have the option after Trump betrayed them. What are you talking about???

[-] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 months ago

Why not? "Trump was an anomaly, if you agree to it we'll make a new binding agreement that's better for you than the previous one and this time by law there's self-imposed consequences if we renege a second time." Are you saying they wouldn't take that?

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 0 points 4 months ago

To be fair when Trump is quite pissibky about to be elected again and his entire party seems to have bought into his general way of doing things, I don't think Iran would be wrong to doubt that claim of him being an anomaly. How would Iran meaningfully enforce penalties upon an America with a second Trump presidency, or a DeSantis presidency, or a Vance presidency?

[-] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, Iran probably wouldn't believe them, but if they get some money or something else from it that they can eat until the USA reneges then that's good enough. And probably whatever penalty will actually be enforced, the USA likes some decorum. If it isn't enforced then it's a good PR for Iran and anyone who didn't act as a guarantor for USA.

I'm arguing against the user saying Biden was left with no choice. I think Biden's regime had a good route towards fixing the mistake, and chose not to take it. I'm trying to say 'Trump' isn't to blame, but the USA, including the USA of today.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
58 points (83.0% liked)

World News

32321 readers
811 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS