What will Meta gain from fediversing? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by ComptitiveSubset@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't understand what Meta will gain from participating in the fediverse? Their ultimate goal is to make money of Threads and I just don't see how encouraging an open federation will help them do it? Even 3Eing the fediverse will not do them much good as they already have sooo much traffic already that killing the fediverse will not make a serious change in their figures. But OTOH it does seem like Threads is net positive for the fediverse ATM. Even if all current denizens of the fediverse will block Threads, there is a large group of people that are exposed to the concept of "fediverse" for the fist time and some of them will want to learn more. This is a good thing. Anyway, I don't know why they are doing it, but I'm cautiously glad they did it. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

I think they're making a move on Twitter. They smell blood in the water, Twitter's weak, not worth buying, but worth supplanting. Here's the Fedverse with a ready-made platform, so no use re-inventing the wheel. They don't care that it's the Fedverse. They just want the interface, to build a replacement.

If Reddit keeps being stupid they can expect the same treatment.

But truly, I know nothing and speculate wildly on most subjects. And I'm new here and understand nothing about the Fedverse.

[-] Nollij@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Twitter’s weak, not worth buying,

Everything has its price. But just like Musk overpaid for Twitter in the first place, he surely thinks it's more valuable than anyone else in the market does.

I'm also sure that he values it at a price point that's higher than it will cost Facebook to create a competitor.