You can advocate for it.

But unless you can convince a majority to vote for it. Doing it would be no better morally then what the tories did in privatising it.

Just because you (and to a lesser extent I ) think it is correct. Dose not mean we have the right to force it on the rest of society against theor will. Have to sell the idea first. And current UK ideals even with a fair voting system. Do not think such things would be fair.

Agreed with transport. Labour won the election claiming privatisation of rail. So we will see that if they continue as claimed. And they clearly have the mandate.

I'd honestly have to check thier policy on buses. Etc as I cannot remember where it ended up.

But once finances are more stable. I think thier is definatly support for improving that. I know local auths are planned to be given more rights. But money may be a more slow change as that very much is the policy labour ran on.

To clarify. Yes I think personally the gov needs to spend to make money as far as some things are concerned. And I prooving public transport to rural villages etc is a huge part of that. More so for enviromental and disability access.

But I will not be supporting any politician that changes the direction a party sell to voters.

While no one expects manifestos and promises to be perfect. The genral ideals of how the nation should be run def are expected to be followed and should be. But more importantly at this point with no real excuse of events being different to the state when votes were cast. No excuse for moving far from what is promised.

So weather it is logical to you and I or not. Spending money without recovering it from government income. Is not an acceptable act by this government at this time.