699
submitted 4 months ago by downpunxx@fedia.io to c/technology@lemmy.world

YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] essteeyou@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

I'm sure I'll be downvoted to hell, but I just pay for Premium because I use YouTube all the time, don't want to see ads, and acknowledge that YouTube is an incredible service/product.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

I don't think that's an unfair thing to say at all.

I want to pay for Premium, but a mixture of oppressive tactics, poor payouts for YouTubers, and constant price hikes has made me reconsider. I watch YouTube more than most streaming providers, and that list continues to shrink because the cost has outpaced the value. A few years ago I couldn't imagine not watching Netflix, but now...eh, cancel it.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The fact that google also tracks and monetizes/exploits every single thing you do should be more than enough payment. Considering thats how they got to be where they are in the first place.

Besides. If google moderated its fucking ads to begin with, people wouldnt have overwhelmingly adopted adblocking, since google adsense is like the biggest adserver on the internet.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I'm in the same boat. There are a lot of parts of the Internet that should be free, but YouTube is not one of them. Video hosting is one of the most resource intensive services around, and if we as consumers aren't paying for it they'll find a worse way to fund it.

[-] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

If YouTube were an independent company, I would be much happier to pay like I do for Spotify and even (borderline) Paramount Plus. I have no problem paying artists for their time, and I have spent thousands and thousands on commissions and merchandise from independent people and art businesses. Google already has enough money. I would rather save my money for small(er) companies who actually need it.

If people stopped supporting these ultra-consolidated megacorporations, we might have a healthier economy and better worker's rights overall. But what do I know lol

[-] ghostface@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Hey very valid statement and salute to you.

Personally, I believe this ultimately hurts and affects customers like yourself. Because YT is spending all of this additional effort to effect and crowdout, if looked at a very tiny percentage. Instead of investing into platform improvements for visitors and creators.

YT should of focused on competition which is every other streaming service. If they provided shows still using network ads breaks, instead of these psycho every 4min you 2.5mins of ads unless you pay is just extortion. Plus they aren't really sharing revenue with creators... sigh

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

And people you're watching are getting money if you're a premium user.

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

It's just gonna make premium more expensive because they have to recoup their engineering costs somehow and I don't think that the extra ad views from bypassing as blockers will cover it.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

Same. My adblockers are still in place, but YouTube premium is by far the best bang for the buck I spend on entertainment. My family uses it every day on multiple devices, and then we get YT music too.

[-] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Me too, I've had YouTube premium since it was called YouTube Red and I was still in middle school lol.

[-] croaker@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Ah yes, the good 'ol days of RedTube.

[-] Intrama@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It's a decent price. I use both the original app and the music one. No regrets at all!

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago

It's not so decent if you only need YouTube though. The package is good, but not everyone needs the full package.

[-] Intrama@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That's... True. I suppose I didn't really think about that.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Based on what I've heard from creators, they love us premium subscribers. If I get no ads and the people I like get more money, I call that a win. Having just been to the movies which have about an hour of unskippable ads at the beginning - including ads to show more ads - I'm willing to pay to not have that in my life.

[-] slumberlust@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I also pay, and share to several family members to help justify the cost.

That just makes us shills though; consumerism is a zero sum game. /s

[-] essteeyou@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It just makes us normal customers of a product. You want something? You pay for it.

[-] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl -4 points 4 months ago

fuck that. you want to be a musician, you play venues and engage with your fans instead of just releasing a one hit wonder that took half a week in the studio to make and made you millions

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
699 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
2898 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS