338
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
338 points (99.4% liked)
Technology
59148 readers
2306 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's almost insulting how cheap the data is going for.
The insurance company buys your driving data for less than a dollar, then cranks your premiums potentially hundreds of dollars per year. Easy money for the insurance company, easy money for the data broker, easy money for the car company, and the little guy gets the shaft as usual.
I think the rhetoric about data gathering needs to change. The average person doesn't really care all that much about their privacy. "The government and all the tech companies are spying on me anyway," they think. "If I have nothing to hide, I have nothing to fear," they tell themselves.
But if people actually understood just how much the prices they pay are driven by data warehousing, there'd be rioting in the streets.
One thing I like to point out to those people is that they are assuming it's accurate data collecting. If for some reason the data broker thought you totaled a car, you can't do squat about insurance agencies raising their rates because of it. You'd never know, you'd just see prices going up. Heck, everybody I know who has checked their credit has seen something that needed correcting. No way data brokers are 100% accurate.