67
linux as business/ company pc?
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
67 points (97.2% liked)
Linux
48653 readers
1325 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Many orgs mandate this. You'll be fine.
I used to roll out mint xfce edition or Qubes to our staff laptops, unless an employee asked for a specific distro. I think some used fedora.
Don't use flatpak; its a security risk.
Why is flatpak a security risk? The applications run isolated and offer higher security, unless I'm missing something?
Because it doesn't verify the authenticity of code it downloads before it installs it
I don't think that that's true. At least not more than for any other community maintained packages.
Debain is community maintained packages and they've done signed manifests on all packages, required by default, since like 2002.
Flapak and snap are terribly insecure compared to standard distro package managers
What? No! Flatpak and Snap are the new trendy toys! How dare you criticize them!
/s
Neither does dnf/apt/pacman. You are always at the mercy of the package maintainer(s).
Nope. Apt definitely cryptographiclly verifies the signatures of everything that it downloads. See
man apt-secureI'm aware, signing the package is not the same thing as signing the code. The application is built by the package maintainer(s) and then the resulting packages are signed.
Which is the same thing that Flatpak does. Both depend on the trust for the repo owner and the package maintainer.