127
submitted 3 months ago by Zip2@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nighed@sffa.community 3 points 3 months ago

I mean it would speed things up, I think the plan involved a bypass for the village next to it too?

I didn't agree with the location of the tunnel though, so kinda happy it got canned.

[-] smeeps@lemmy.mtate.me.uk 15 points 3 months ago

It would move the queues to the next bottleneck. "Just one more lane bro" planning never works.

Rail between London and Cornwall needs improving instead, as does local transport around Salisbury (active travel, public transport) as a large portion of the queuing vehicles are local drivers avoiding congestion in the town.

[-] Nighed@sffa.community 4 points 3 months ago

On the one more lane thing, going from 1 lane each way to two is a massive improvement as it allows overtaking.

Agree otherwise.

[-] wren@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago

When I saw Stonehenge as a kid, we just drove past it really slowly, with my dad saying "don't worry, everyone else wants to slow down to look too!"

Now I make that drive every few weeks 🫠

[-] Nighed@sffa.community 3 points 3 months ago

I mean, it's a bottleneck heading back towards London too, between the barrow roundabout and Stonehenge is often a mess in both directions. Mostly due to people looking at Stonehenge instead of the road.

It's less about improving the trains and more about making them cheaper! (Not that I would complain about some new lines either!)

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
127 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4092 readers
72 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS