924
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 months ago

Lenin wasn't a socialist. He was a transparently dishonest fraud who built a cult of personality. The best thing you can say is that he failed because if the results were a success, Lenin was a monster.

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

While Lenin was a flawed leader, and did some shady shit in the name of revolution, I don't think it's fair or honest to call him a fraud. Man was literally imprisoned because of his beliefs. Not saying we should follow him religiously like some people do, he definitely made mistakes. Now if this was Stalin we were talking about I could understand.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He was imprisoned for what he wrote about. His actions tell me that he was not a socialist, and that's what matters. He held an election, immediately enacted violence to change the outcome, immediately dismantled the socialist power structures that were in place, purged people who didn't agree with him, and acted as an autocrat.

Anyone who thinks Lenin was a socialist is ignorant of history.

Edit: I can't actually see who replied to me because I blocked them ๐Ÿ˜‚ tells me what I need to know about the people arguing with me.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

immediately dismantled the socialist power structures that were in place

That's insanely ahistorical. The socialist power structures that were in place, existed precisely BECAUSE of Lenin and the Bolsheviks. And soviets had a very high degree of government control all the way up until the death of Lenin. You're seriously mistaken about this

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Showing to us all you haven't studied the figure of Lenin in an honest way in your life.

Lenin dedicated most of his life (in exile from the tsarist regime for doing so) to study, write on, and agitate against, the issues of the masses. He was openly against becoming a personality cult, he maintained his democratic ideals until the moment a civil war broke and terrorist attacks started to kill members of the party and attempted to kill him, and if you read any of his writings it's patently obvious that he's obsessed with the well-being of the working class.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl -1 points 3 months ago

any of his writings

Both Napoleon and Hitler ~~wrote~~ had other people write of them that they had the best intentions for true respective populaces. However in practice it turned out they used them as cannon fodder.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Hitler had famous writings detailing his ragingly racist and antisemitic views, and committed holocaust against specific ethnicities and nationalities out of Aryan-supremacism.

Napoleon was a militarist nationalist whose life was purely a militarist endeavour. He pursued violent expansionism out of patriotic fervor.

Comparing Lenin, a lawyer who escaped the autocratic regime of his homeland and spent a life in exile examining Marxist texts on how to improve the life conditions of people, to either Napoleon or Hitler, shows you have absolutely no idea of the values Lenin valued and promoted, you haven't read one single of his texts, and you're speaking purely out of anti-communist sentiment that's been ingrained in your brain.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not comparing their politics, but making the point that the self proclaimed ideologies of leaders may be embellished or different from the practice.

Saying that Lenin in theory had the week being of people in mind is rather moot if I'm practice he didn't give many shits about the people and only tried clinging to power regardless of the suffering his people went through.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago

And now you're proving you don't know anything of the history of the russian revolution. The only event you can point of "authoritarianism" during the Russian Revolution and Lenin's life, is the red terror. By any reasonably account, the red terror was very measured and not arbitrarily applied, and it happened in the context of a civil war against monarchists in which 14 nations including England, France, and Italy, sent troops and agitators to the Russian Socialist Federation of Soviet Republics, with numbers comparable to that of the oppression by the republicans towards fascists in the Spanish civil war.

Do you know why you've never heard (unless you're Spanish) condemnation of the repression against fascists during the Spanish civil war? Because the reds lost. The only good leftist for you anticommunists is the leftist who dies to fascism, like Salvador Allende. As soon as a communist revolution triumphs, you declare it a perversion and oppressive regardless of the history.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

I know of the Spanish Civil War, I studied history. I'd even identify as leftist. I'm only staunchly anti-authorithorian. Hence me opposing Franco in the Spanish revolution. Just like another person whom you might hate a Eric Arthur Blair (aka George Orwell).

I mean I respect Stalin as a theoretician, but actions speak louder than theory. And like my main point; people's own writings are only maybe proof of intention, but practice shows the commitment to those and most autocrats tend to be quite loose with them.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago

Now moving the goalposts to Stalin. The great terror was unnecessary, harmful, excessively cruel and unjustified, and overall a disaster that should never have happened.

I know of the Spanish Civil War, I studied history. I'd even identify as leftist. I'm only staunchly anti-authorithorian. Hence me opposing Franco in the Spanish revolution.

Ok, now, why did Franco win the war? What if the republicans, instead of "ohhh evil Franco! We got you! Don't try to plot a coup again, ok? Please!", they had actually organized before the coup and repressed the fascists that needed repressing? What if Salvador Allende instead of being just the best democrat, had imprisoned or murdered the fascist opposition? What if we could have avoided decades of fascism as the USSR managed to do? Assuming you support the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War, do you realize that you're only supporting the leftists that lose, and that as soon as leftists take control, you categorize it as authoritarian?

[-] Juice@midwest.social -3 points 3 months ago

That's not how he was described by anyone who was alive at the time except for business men who lost their investments in tsarist Russia, but keep believing in spooky ghost stories.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

To the people downvoting this: please ask yourselves whether you've read anything Lenin wrote, or read any non-anticommunist article or book on the Russian Revolution and Lenin

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 months ago
[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago

What are you? A Trotskyist? A Liberal?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A NATO-Anarchist, anti-Marxist, at least from what I gathered before they blocked me for defending Marx. Someone who stans Western Hegemony and constantly decries Marxists.

Even Trotskyists like Lenin.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Wow, you think those are the only options?

Tankie Detected.

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago

It was a serious question, but it seems you are unable to abstain from childish retorts.

Not a tankie btw, not even a communist of any tendency

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

I don't belive you; I think you're a liar, because you didn't ask a neutral question; you gave notoriously terrible options.

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 0 points 3 months ago

Too cowardly to be upfront about your own politics huh? Doesn't matter, you've already been identified as a liberal by someone you blocked for defending Marxism.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's the most stereotypically tankie accusation I've ever read! ๐Ÿ˜‚

They blocked me for defending "Marxism" (MLism isn't actually Marxism) they must be a liberal! (Libertarian Socialism isn't liberalism)

Or maybe they're just lying. Tankies do that literally all the time.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
924 points (94.3% liked)

Lefty Memes

4407 readers
32 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS