174
Nothing's definitely off in here (i.imgflip.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IverCoder@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not that it's bad. For me, it's actually very useful, I just find it mildly amusing that an app for managing AppImages is packaged as a Flatpak, despite the two formats being widely known as competitors*.

* Okay, most people (including me) would say that the two formats are for different use cases and aren't directly competitors, but for the eyes of a lot of AppImage purists and Flatpak critics, they are.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Norgur@kbin.social 68 points 1 year ago

Let's trigger some peeps:

Is there a docker image available?

[-] 30p87@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago

mqdefault

Just give me the source code. Under GPLv3 of course.

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

May I interject for a moment. What you are referring to as a Docker Image is actually an Open Container.org Image or OCI.... Continues stallman quote

[-] BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What's off? It's an app for managing appimages that is hosted on flathub. Just because it is a flatpak does not mean it can't manage appimages

edit: a word

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

At the same time, it's like a Ford executive driving a Chevy. It looks wrong.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

More like a train conductor driving a car between their home and work.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Knew a Porsche employee whose company car was a Beemer, so maybe it's not quite as rare as you think?

[-] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago

This is not really a competition. Options are good.

[-] Mane25@feddit.uk 23 points 1 year ago

What's off? That looks like it might be useful.

[-] rikudou 26 points 1 year ago

Tool for managing AppImages is distributed only as a flatpak.

[-] Mane25@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

I mean they are two things that co-exist, it's not like they're in commercial competition. Flatpak itself is usually distributed as an RPM or deb.

[-] 10EXP@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

OP is mostly joking about the appimage utility not having an appimage itself

[-] IverCoder@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Speaking of that app, I have been using it for some of my programs that are only available as an AppImage for sometime now and I can confirm it works really great.

Flathub link in case anybody's interested

[-] Mane25@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

OK well I'm not sure where the AppImage "purists" and Flatpak "critics" are but I've not really encountered them.

[-] gamey@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lucky you, those idiots are fucking everywhere!

[-] IverCoder@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Tip: take a look at r/Linux and the Phoronix forums 😉

[-] 601error@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I like and monetarily support Phoronix the news site, but the forums have some of the worst Linux users. Lots of people upset about the silliest things and confidently spouting incorrect nonsense.

[-] Rogueren@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

How is it compared to AppImageLauncher? That's what I've been using for a few things that only ship AppImage.

[-] gamey@feddit.rocks 18 points 1 year ago

I bet the dev gets a lot of angry comments over that, a absolute hero!

[-] vikingtons@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I think we should just be happy it exists 😅

[-] pc_admin@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

indeed :)

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Everytime they add a feature to AppImage, they just keep trying to recreate flatpak but worse.

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 9 points 1 year ago

It's a statement, it's about sending a message!

[-] rinaderp@wetdry.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

obviously good for the bit, but the serious reason why this exists is likely because it's a modern gtk app -> it's meant for gnome users / made by a gnome users -> gnome is all in on freedesktop/flathub -> these users can all expect to have flatpak availability as a common method of distribution -> therefore, release it as a flatpak, so these users who already have flatpak can more easily manage their appimage-only programs

[-] Perroboc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Wow, this is great! Thanks!

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
174 points (88.2% liked)

Linux

47364 readers
1130 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
nooter692@lemmy.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz