146
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ignirtoq@fedia.io 29 points 4 months ago

I was expecting some kind of analysis showing that otherwise normal people who adopted GOP politics simultaneously transitioned to showing sociopathic behavior, like in a measurable, scientific way. Instead the author gives a definition of sociopathy ("acting without feelings of guilt, remorse, or shame coupled with a tendency to reject the concept of responsibility") and proceeds to label the policy positions and enacted laws of the GOP as sociopathic.

Applying neuroscience terms developed for individual people to actions of groups does not seem scientific at all. Isn't that the field of sociology? I'm not really sure how such a labeling helps the conversation, especially from a neuroscientist. I don't disagree with the positions, but this isn't neuroscience, so I can't really take this author as any sort of authority or expert on this; I feel like this article has the same level of expertise as a Lemmy comment (like mine).

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I was really hoping for some theory of how sociopathy could be contagious. Nothing. I'ts just name-calling.

[-] Maeve@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Ron was a gitmo guard. I'd need to see prior records of behavioral tendencies to say he became one of the latent, but opportunistic tendencies were there.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 13 points 4 months ago

I enjoyed this book on sociopathy in society https://www.amazon.com/Sociopath-Next-Door-Martha-Stout/dp/0767915828

I'm not 100% sold on the contagious idea but certainly every latent socio and narc has had a masterclass in recent years which would tend to embolden them.

[-] Feliskatos@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It should be noted that the term I have been using – contagious sociopathy – is not mutually exclusive from what we have been observing with the perversion of Christian thought to suit sociopathic behaviors and the rise of fascism in the U.S. (Ruth Ben-Ghiat has written extensively on the latter). ...

The bolded link goes to a Pew Research page and looks like it will take me more time than I'm willing to spend digesting it. It occurred to me that sociopath or perhaps psychopath is an accurate psychological description of the god described in the old testament but not necessarily the new. Can anyone explain in a few words what is meant by "perversion of Christian thought"?

[-] cakeistheanswer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 months ago

Christofacism. Really you can look at the Westboro baptist church for how emphasis on their duty to a fallen society over gods love looks.

If it makes it into a congregation the reasonable people leave, and the rest radicalize further.

[-] Feliskatos@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[-] str82L@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Sounds interesting - got a non-paywalled link handy?

[-] ignirtoq@fedia.io 7 points 4 months ago
[-] str82L@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I appreciate the effort, but the archive link keeps timing out on me sorry.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
146 points (91.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4267 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS