this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
425 points (96.5% liked)

Traditional Art

5484 readers
1 users here now

From dabblers to masters, obscure to popular and ancient to futuristic, this is an inclusive community dedicated to showcasing all types of art by all kinds of artists, as long as they're made in a traditional medium

'Traditional' here means 'Physical', as in artworks which are NON-DIGITAL in nature.

What's allowed: Acrylic, Pastel, Encaustic, Gouache, Oil and Watercolor Paintings; Ink Illustrations; Manga Panels; Pencil and Charcoal sketches; Collages; Etchings; Lithographs; Wood Prints; Pottery; Ceramics; Metal, Wire and paper sculptures; Tapestry; weaving; Qulting; Wood carvings, Armor Crafting and more.

What's not allowed: Digital art (anything made with Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Blender, GIMP or other art programs) or AI art (anything made with Stable Diffusion, Midjourney or other models)


make sure to check the rules stickied to the top of the community before posting.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] banghida@lemm.ee 96 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 119 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It is about rape, so yeah. The telling of trauma is intentional.

[–] banghida@lemm.ee 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh ok, I see it now. It seemed abstract at first glance.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Totally. It is a bit abstract, or perhaps Dada or Surrealism inspired. It could be said that trauma is baked into those movements.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sometimes to properly show the horrors of the real you have to leave the real behind

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, history and art don't repeat themselves, contemporaries rhyme with the past.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's considered surrealist by which ever groups of Art History PhDs who decide these things

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Makes sense.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read it as about menstruation

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. The sexual assault reading comes from the artist.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My first look was similar. But after reading the comments and looking again, it became more obvious to be about rape.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's what I said, in the comments.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Sorry, I misinterpreted your comment. Cheers.

Oh interesting. I definitely see that now. I thought it was “passion according to gh”

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I hate that I could tell what it was about without looking at the comments :/

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Seems like a good depiction of what it's like to be forced to carry your rapist's baby

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

It's interesting how the first and final frames have similar poses.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jesus christ what’s going on here?

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Depiction of rape

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago
[–] Ironfist@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

nsfw label would had been appreciated...

This book is psychedelic.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wish someone would fuck me like that... 😮‍💨

load more comments
view more: next ›