The Nordic Way of Freedom (prospect.org)

submitted 1 year ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] pc_admin@aussie.zone 13 points 1 year ago

The deep-down truth is that all modern societies are highly complex and interdependent, and therefore every person depends on others in innumerable ways. The way to actually maximize freedom for the greatest number of people is to face that fact squarely, and arrange institutions so that people have the resources necessary to make meaningful choices when possible. American “freedom” is instead about pandering to the entitled, wealthy minority who want to indulge their every whim, no matter the consequences to others or themselves.

Good article, spot on really.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Strict traffic rules are a burden, in the sense that one must obey or pay a hefty price. But they also enable a much freer driving experience.

Rules and regulation as freedom-enabling are anathema to modern American hegemonic ideology, which is fundamentally economic in a neoclassical sense.

The book The Illusion of Free Markets makes a similar point as the article:

True liberty required government organization. In order to achieve cheapness and plenty-the central goals of public economy-it was necessary to calibrate the market. According to this view, police and liberty formed a coherent whole: policing was the prerequisite of bon marche, and bon marche the prerequisite requisite of liberty.

But I'm not going to bother quoting someone Milton Friedman or F.A. Hayek, both of whom argued that government regulation stifles innovation, wastes human energy, and worst of all, led directly to socialism, which they defined as government control of industry, and which was necessarily totalitarian.

The freedom to be a jerk that gets to inconvenience everyone else (or unilaterally involve yourself in a war you nothing to do with) only makes sense if a major component of freedom is being unconstrained. But not having any constraints goes against everything about being a better person in any way. Honing the body is about constraining it to an environment that facilitates its improvement. Honing the mind, similarly, is not the self-directed exploration of conspiracy theories on YouTube. Aristotle's virtue ethics confines virtuous decisions between excess and deficiency.

But for Americans, all of that is nonsense.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023

23 points (92.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers

3956 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News