32

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago

Not a sneer, but still a damn good piece on AI from Brian Merchant:

The great and justified rage over using AI to automate the arts

(Personal sidenote: Tech's public image is almost certainly gonna take a nosedive as a result of this AI bubble. "We made a machine with the express purpose of putting artists out of business" isn't a business case, its the setup for a shitty teen dystopian novel.)

(Fuck, now I wanna try and predict how the AI bubble bursting will play out...)

[-] corbin@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago
[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago

2 Giant 2 Rat Penis

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 8 points 4 months ago

Okay but this is about alkaline water so it's garbage even without the genAI imagery.

It's even by Wu et al., come on, low hanging fruit

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago

Butters and Trump are ruining my ability to get anything done in town today. Not a big fan of this dumb shit inconveniencing me IRL.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 4 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gerikson@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Libertarian nerds run straight into actual California, not the AI-generated dreamland they imagine

Mercury news: "Billionaires’ utopia company California Forever scraps plan for ballot initiative in wake of damning report"

https://archive.ph/UbdBw

The report released late last week by Solano County said the proposed new city of 50,000 — possibly up to 400,000 decades from now — would likely cost the county billions of dollars and create substantial annual financial deficits, while slashing agricultural production, damaging climate-change resilience, and potentially threatening local water supplies. The project, according to the report, “may not be financially feasible.”

HN shows what they think of the 3 people with actual thoughts on the issue by downvoting them to death

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41047746

[-] maol@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Who could have predicted this except for everybody ! There's a reason none of these galt gulches ever get built.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago

which spent more than $800 million buying more than 60,000 acres of mostly agricultural land near Fairfield

Marc Andreessen and Reid Hoffman, just in case anyone thought there was a difference

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fasterandworse@awful.systems 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Jeremy Keith on the bullshit "privacy sandbox" in chrome and firefox: https://adactio.com/journal/21285

I like Jeremy because he is an OG, but I think his requirement for proof that targeted advertising "works" before the browsers implement these features is off the mark for me. He's an agency guy, a bit like Andy Budd, so they tend to have these really visceral takes about the state of the web but with this skewed perspective of best interests

[-] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago

There was no technical reason why we couldn’t have web fonts. The reason why we didn’t get web fonts for years and years was because browser makers were concerned about piracy and type foundries.

I was a bit surprised when I learned fonts are CORSd at least party as a sort of primitive DRM so that font companies would buy into the webfont spec (that's how I remember it anyway, it's been awhile since I dug up the relevant mailing list messages)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1427 readers
106 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS