Back in the day the best way to find cool sites when you were on a cool site was to click next in the webring. In this age of ailing search engines and confidently incorrect AI, it is time for the webring to make a comeback.

This person has given his the code to get started: Webring

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] bobdobberson@dobbs.town 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

@mrpalmer16 one of my favorite things back in the day was the old-school "StumbleUpon" which was like webrings on crack.

Unfortunately, advertising and profit-seeking happened.

[–] speeding_slug@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah man, those times were great. Bored? Just push the button and you'll see something new. No scrolling, just a new website with random interesting stuff to explore.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Old StumbleUpon was everything to me

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Wow i got hit right in the nostalgies thinking about StumbleUpon

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Stumbleupon was great. I remember having a browser plug in for it. Then I stopped using it for a little while and never went back to it.

Does it still exist?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nope. Died like Digg and a bunch of others. There's a run down here (which I only quickly skimmed): https://productmint.com/what-happened-to-stumbleupon/

load more comments (2 replies)

[+] peteramthor@dice.camp 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 17 points 1 year ago

It will happen out of necessity once LLMs make search engines useless. Bookmarks and human-curated content will be the only way to find stuff.

It's already affecting small businesses worldwide, who aren't being discovered anymore by searches in their local area.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So would people having webpages instead of social media accounts

And there's your problem... (in the voice of Jamie Hyneman, Mythbusters). To see a real return of webrings, people would need to have (make) their own pages and curate some links.

Thinking about it, with the rise of selfhosted, it's actually really viable, cobble together a docker stack with a WYSIWYG HTML editor somewhat oriented to the task (pretty sure something out there can be repurposed), a web server, proxy, and that's about it (probably missing a fair bit, not my bailiwick, still, once the stack is made and solid, I'm guessing many would host, I would). Set a threshold of how many people you're willing to host, say 50 or whatever so you're able to check for CSAM or other legal minefields, and Bob's your uncle, stir in some solid security to keep it isolated if you're using it at home (or VPS) and it's golden.

OK, more complicated than I initially thought, and it's way less friction to use something like faceplant, which is entirely their point. Still, I think, if given the opportunity, and functional tools, and low enough friction, many would prefer to have a hand curated presence on the web above a facebook page.

I'll stop, but thanks for the interesting thought seed.

[–] chip@feddit.rocks 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There has to be a cultural shift as well. It's not the early 2000s anymore where a substantial portion of internet users could tinker around their desktop computers. I recently got fiber at home and we're locked behind CGNAT. I could look for a solution for myself since I grew up opening ports on my router, but imagine someone who grew up with bubble-wrapped smartphones trying to navigate their way through that bs.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

Website hosting is still a thing. Not everything needs to be self hosted.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're not wrong, but here we are, talking open source and GPL licences. If you can make a game portal work, or the web in general, it's viable, your ISP is a choke point though, agreed. Was more talking about an easy stack like the 'arrs, but for webrings, just an idea...

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love this idea, the back button on browsers feels like it exists because of webrings

[–] superkret@feddit.org 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It exists because web browsers used to not have tabs. Nowadays it's useless cause with modern scripted web pages you never properly get back to the site you left

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

then you're visiting websites that are badly coded

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just block JavaScript

[–] superkret@feddit.org 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Then the entire browser becomes useless. I couldn't even post this comment without JavaScript.

Edit: I wish a search engine that only showed websites without JavaScript existed.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Umatrix is great, you can configure it to automatically allow first party javascript, and if sites still dont work eneable bits until they do them lock those settings so the same bits will be enabled next time you're on that site.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can do that with NoScript too. Is the Umatrix UI any better, or are there other benefits?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wish also that THAT search engine also made it so turning on results that have paywalls is a thing you can only have turned on if YOU turn it on

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] Andrzej@lemmy.myserv.one 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gonna add my voice to those calling for a foss stumbleupon

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah! StumbleUpon was cool. Something about how it tried to engender serendipity.

Such a pity that so many other good recommendation engines died or succumbed to enshittification.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] antrosapien@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Kagi is also experimenting with small web

https://kagi.com/smallweb/

[–] probablynaked@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Man I wanna like Kagi but I keep reading batshit things from its founder

[–] greyw0lv@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Be like him, but don't copy the batshit.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Man what a trip, felt like I was hopping around the old web again.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

This is like the old StumbleUpon! Thanks for this!

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The idea comes up again and again on the fediverse. It feels ripe for some app/platform to kinda nail it.

I’m not sure this is it or even something that does exactly the old web ring thing. I think a simple enough system for the human curation of web pages in a standardised way that can easily be consumed and aggregated would go a long way though. The fediverse feels like its close to something.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

What about https://webri.ng ?

load more comments (11 replies)

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There is also Gemini protocol!

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm aware of it (and while not being super enthused about it, I can my personal interest growing over time as the internet keeps tracking the way it is).

But how does it help with a page recommendation system? Is there a strong culture of that sort of thing on Gemini?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm down.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You gotta be down to know whats up.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Stumbleupon was fun.

I miss old web shit.

Ninety zeros dot com was one of the Internet's weirdest best things.

[–] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

I'm in a few webrings! https://wetnoodle.org they're under the navigation menu towards the bottom

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What would be really cool would be an open source, federated version of DMOZ

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maia Arson Crimew, one of my favorite hackers, is in a webring https://maia.crimew.gay

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh man that site looks just like the internet before it started to suck.

[–] fionnafire@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Neocities does this right?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

hexbear's trans comm just hooked into one! super cool

[–] LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Couldn't agree more

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

This is so cool!

[–] crozilla@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Is the StumbleUpon thing not something Mozilla could do with Pocket?

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't believe anyone did this. It's totally random (within pool of participants). There's a reason it went away. Is the equivalent of "I'm feeling lucky" but with a smaller pool. I guess I'd you like random it's fine I guess?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You didn't have a good experience with it, many of us did have some food experiences with it.

But it made going out on the Internet interesting. Today I'm not sure if its less or more risky to view a sketchy site, is it more risky now with ransom ware, data scraypers, and such.

Ide consider viruses to be less of a risk today, but my results probably vary

My experience was that those webrings often worth checking out if you didnt have something specific you were looking for today.

Its not the same at all, but theres a sense of my experience when i suddenly realize im on wikipedia and have opened 50+ tabs after I've finished what i was reading. Then just going through the tabs you have open

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments