431
submitted 3 months ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 170 points 3 months ago

600 miles? Call me when they make one small enough to fit in a car

heyooooo

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 57 points 3 months ago

You joke but I literally pictured a super long battery for a solid bit before it clicked. I was thinking maybe it was coiled and technically really long like a spool of wire

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gumnut@aussie.zone 18 points 3 months ago

It’s such a dumb metric for batteries. I wish people would stop using it.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 months ago

Eh, it’s really not that dumb assuming there’s an average electric discharge for electric vehicles. Most laypeople don’t understand kWh beyond “bigger number better”.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

I mean its a more a metric for the over vehicle. It can move its self that distance on a charge.

The battery would kWh but that alone is insufficient for evaluating the vehicle

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

kWh/Kg is really all that matters, maybe max charge/discharge rates too.

But they aren’t clickbatey enough for commercial news.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago

If it were any other company I would be thrilled. With Samsung, this is going to be internet enabled, you'll need an app to turn your car on and off, and it'll probably play ads at high volumes constantly while driving.

[-] OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world 77 points 3 months ago

I know you jest, but Samsung is a massive battery supplier.

These will be plain old dumb batteries

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 57 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I dunno man, my 21700 cells just got an OTA update and now my flashlights wont turn on without watching an ad blinked out in mores code first.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 months ago

"Never install, carry or handle". OK but what are they for then?

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 7 points 3 months ago

These are cells that are meant to be assembled into larger battery packs by electronics manufacturers, like laptop batteries or e bike batteries.

The cells are fantastic for flashlights, lasers, and vapes, but Samsung does not sell them to end consumers and wishes other companies would not do that either but fuck Samsung I'm not stupid.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 months ago

Its a battery that'll be used by other manufacturers

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

So what's the catch? Is it the price?

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

FTA:

Apparently, they are also rather expensive to produce, since it warns that they will first go into the "super premium" EV segment of luxury electric cars that can cover more than 600 miles on a charge.

So yes. Expensive initially.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 3 months ago
[-] aviationeast@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Don't fly your car with the Samsung battery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 months ago

Basically, yes. The big issue with solid state batteries is figuring out how to mass produce them at a price where someone will actually buy them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For a smaller EV It would take around 200kWh worth of battery for a 600 mile range. The current Tesla "superchargers" put out 250kWh. So whatever is going to charge this battery will have to output roughly an order of magnitude more power in order to charge the battery in 6 minutes. That's an impressive and scary amount of energy transfer.

Edit: I don't know where I got 6 minutes from. So not quite 10X the power for charging, but a LOT more than current chargers.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 58 points 3 months ago

A couple things: solid state batteries weigh much less. Solid state batteries are 30-50% lighter per kWh. The initial ones will probably be closer to 30% lighter. A 100 kWh battery weighs about 1400 lbs (635 kg). Shaving off 400 lbs is pretty significant and results in much better range for the same battery capacity. The battery pack is likely closer to 150 kWh.

Second thing would be the charge rate. Yes, a supercharger can 250 kW output (not kWh BTW) but a few factors means that they often do not. First thing would be heat. If the charging cable or the battery gets too hot, the the rate slows down. The next thing would be the fact that current batteries have to start at a slow rate and end at a slow rate. Solid state batteries do not have those issue nearly as much and can more consistently hit that 250 kW output for a longer period of time.

This thing, they are likely using 350+ kW chargers. Higher than 350 kW is pretty rare but the odd 400 kW and 450 kW charger does exist.

And doing some more digging, I found that it is from 8% to 80% in 9 minutes. And even then, it does not say it is the same 150 kWh battery that is being charged that fast. This could be marketing crap where it is giving numbers for a ~85 kWh battery to compare it to EVs today. An Ioniq 5 takes about twice as long to go from 10-80% at 350 kW.

[-] cestvrai@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

Super informative, thanks :)

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 months ago

The current Tesla "superchargers" put out 250kWh

kW

My wall outlet charger puts out 250 kWh, if you leave it in for 2 weeks straight...

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 months ago

So each supercharger will need it's own miniature fusion power plant. Great, now fast charging solid state batteries will always be 30 years away.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] jackyard@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'd love to imagine around 20 years later people would be retrofitting old and heavy phone, laptop, and EV batteries with lighter and faster-charging ones...

[-] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 3 months ago

20 years is very nice, how recyclable are they after that though?

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Needs to be an option to put these into todays EVs. You shouldn't have to buy a brand new car to get better battery technology.

[-] ShadowRam@fedia.io 20 points 3 months ago

Today's EV's batteries will already outlast the car.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

What material is inside?

These articles call it "oxide" but what exactly is it?

[-] aramova@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Things which oxidized.

Seriously I hate articles like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
431 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59312 readers
4650 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS