23
After a brief roar, OFWAT lets out a little mew and rolls over to have its tummy ticked by corporate interests.
I mean, they're pretty much about to go under - do they even have the £104m to pay?
Does that matter? If you've only got £100 to your name and you break the law, the courts don't normally give a toss. You still have to pay lawyer fees and fines even if it means you go into debt.
Why should a for-profit company be treated any differently?
It might even be the catalyst to bring them back into national ownership and be rid of the root problem that made them break the law in the first place.
Well sure, but then is the British government on the hook for the debt that the investors are going to be calling in?
No.
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
378 readers
63 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS