362
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 207 points 2 months ago

In three weeks, we’ll find out Roger Stone has a Grindr account.

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 69 points 2 months ago

He has a Nixon tattoo, you don't idolize another man that much without at least thinking about fucking them, so it's likely he has an account.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

He’s probably seen a few up close.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 months ago

Im not saying Roger Stone would suck a dick, but he'd keep it in his mouth while he was thinking about it.

[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 months ago

I mean, he did have a three way with a dude so I wouldn't really be surprised. (This was in the 90s.)

[-] Fester@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

That dude’s name? Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

That girl's name? Ashley Furniture (aka JD Vance)

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I was rounded the '90s, but I was in high school. That's why I know that it's only gay if the tips touch.

[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We already know he likes to invite black guys to fuck his wife while he watches.

[-] Princeali311@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I thought that was Paul Manafort.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

That's what I wanted to write as well. This smells like a self-report.

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 132 points 2 months ago

Every accusation is a confession

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

Roger Stone definitely has a face that's sucked a cock more than once during a coke binge

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

He has a full back tattoo of Nixon. I'm sure many a load have been shot on that fascist tableau.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

why are we even giving this motherfucker headlines. ignore them.

[-] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 42 points 2 months ago

Because Roger Stone is a dangerous terrorist?

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah didn’t he also have a hand in the campaign for the previous Ukrainian pres that pretty much bowed out for Putin?

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

Paul Manafort did, but Stone might have been involved to, not sure.

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think that’s the guy i was thinking of.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

Well then. I thought the creepy weirdo Stone and his wife were swingers? The guy who called himself a "try-sexual"?

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

Wow! Bet the n-word isn't far behind.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 28 points 2 months ago

It's Roger Stone, it was well in front.

[-] GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

If that happens, I would say that's an exception to every accusation being a confession

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Today, on Finding Your Roots...

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Well Roger stone is a beta cuck bitch so…

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 months ago

Those cretins on either side laughing at his hateful bullshit look like monsters to me.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Really? They look like just stupid mean teenagers to me.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I just watched a documentary about this human garbage and he supposedly decided to be in favor of gay people a few years ago. He even matched at pride one year (albeit to huge boos)

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Weren't he and Roy Cohn hooking up on the DL for over a decade? Every accusation is a confession with these cockroaches.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
362 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3859 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS