this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
586 points (93.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4209 readers
399 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BB69@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago (3 children)

EVs suddenly don’t get good fuel economy?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I mean, with EVs, you compare the economy to other EVs.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The cybertruck would use, according to at least one estimate, about 350 Wh/km, which puts it as the least efficient EV (including an old source). Compares to about an F-150 Lightning.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Hummer has 419 Wh/km, or worse, so even with that estimate it wouldn't be the worst.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

That's a lot. Looked up numbers for high-speed rail: for passangers minimum is 29Wh/km/sest in Japan and maximum is 41Wh/km/seat for Eurostar, for freight it's between 315Wh/km/t and 525Wh/km/t. Again, this is for high-speed rail at least 300km/h. For slow speed train(for example 90km/h) this will go much, much lower. Probably something between 30 and 100Wh/km/t.

[–] Metanoia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Man I need those numbers converted to mi/kwh

[–] sysadmin420@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Satoshis per yard/h

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Metanoia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Darn that's less than half of what I get

[–] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If it's a new car, then it's less efficient than your old car. This is still true (or possibly even more true) for electric cars.

[–] overat8@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Does T-14 have a glass window that supposedly bulletproof?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes but please don't let a weedy exec tap it lightly with a hammer

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the cybertruck looks cool but I'm also really into N64 graphics

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

FX chip! Starfox!

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Wish I could claim credit, but I stole it from Old NCD

[–] crackajack@reddthat.com 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

T-14 is still pretty cool. I'd like to see it blown up!

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Let's see if it's a better competitor at the Turret Toss Championship!

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

The check should actually get really good mpge, particularly compared to a tank.

[–] uis@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Doesn't look like captured during WW2 tank, so no on bottom-right.

load more comments
view more: next ›