32
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This article is funny

But none have stepped up to condemn India for its alleged involvement in the June slaying on Canadian soil of a Sikh separatist, Hardeep Singh Nijjar. Why?

later,

Canada has yet to provide any evidence of India’s involvement in the killing. But . . .

How many guesses do we get for the question?

[-] zaphod@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's also wrong. We know the five eyes have been involved in providing intelligence on the incident. Canada hasn't publicly released evidence, but to therefore conclude there isn't any or it hasn't been shared privately is a pretty big leap.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have no doubts the five eyes believe the accusations and have / are mounting their own evidence, but I also don't expect world governments to start condeming or sanctioning India based on hidden evidence because that doesn't sound like a very diplomatic way to procede as a third party country to this fiasco.

Edit: woke up today to articles about indian comms obtained to canada and Biden talking to Modi personally, so it seems we're already developing a little more past the info we had.

[-] zaphod@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I totally agree with you. The article is just shitty (which seems to be a pattern with coverage of this story).

[-] posthexbearposting@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

India has a Hindu fascist government ethnically cleansing Muslims, Sikhs and other minority groups. It's really not a stretch that they organized the death of a Sikh separatist leader.

[-] reddit_sux@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago

Just because there is evidence to the former doesn't mean it directly implies the latter.

Bush was not a dictator yet he misled a whole nation to fulfill his wet dream of killing Saddam Hussein, and indirectly gave rise to Daesh(ISIS).

Obama was awarded the Nobel peace prize but he did impugn the sovereignty of another nation to kill a known terrorist.

If what Canada is saying is true it is not any different than nations of five eyes have already been doing. All of them who supposedly uphold democratic principles when it suits them.

This is an ongoing investigation and remarks should await its results.

[-] Armen12@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

This is some prime journalism here, no facts or evidence, just "we think so because..."

I mean that's just some peak journalism right there.

[-] Godort@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, this whole situation sucks, but from an international politics standpoint it makes sense why they wouldn't take a side until we're absolutely sure rather than just pretty sure that India's government was involved in the killing.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

No opinion on the assassination itself yet just love watching Canada eat shit

[-] posthexbearposting@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A fascist kills a Sikh campaigning against the fascist cleansing of his people and you think this is Canada eating shit? I'm surprised Canada even cares. Canada's material interests are so non-existent here. I suppose they're just mad about their false sense of sovereignty being violated.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

I suppose they're just mad about their false sense of sovereignty being violated.

This, yes, along with the tepid noncomittance of it's "allies" publically hanging it out to dry

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
32 points (88.1% liked)

World News

32318 readers
1234 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS