SCOTUS could deal another blow to climate action / A cornerstone of US efforts to tackle climate change is in the hands of the Supreme Court again. (www.theverge.com)

submitted 2 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] rocci@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 months ago

I'm so fucking sick of these guys

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Impeach, impeach, impeach

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

You just need to vote harder

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 16 points 2 months ago

Yes, you do. People didn't take Trump seriously, and he put these clowns into lifetime appointments. Likewise, there's lots of judges around the country he appointed, like Aileen Canon.

If we can take back the majority in the House, keep the majority in the Senate, and get Harris and Walz elected, there's a lot we will be able to do to restore SCOTUS and the rest of the judiciary to working order.

So yes. Vote harder. Stop doing the dirty work of the Republicans by tacitly implying that voting doesn't matter.

[+] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If we can take back the majority in the House, keep the majority in the Senate, and get Harris and Walz elected, there’s a lot we will be able to do to restore SCOTUS and the rest of the judiciary to working order.

A lot they can do, assuming they don't find an excuse to not do it.

But Dems will never be better situated than they were in 2009. And look what they did with their spoils then. They comprised with Republicans until they got Mitt Romney's health care plan and nothing else - no carbon caps or path to citizenship or abortion rights or public collegiate education or court reform or even DC statehood.

Do you really think Harris, a woman who has fallen upwards her whole career and never really shown a passion for any kind of progressive policy will outperform a party that actually ran on Hope and Change?

She and Biden have always just been a placeholder to keep Trump out. They were never really expected to do anything popular.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

Do you really think Harris, a woman who has fallen upwards her whole career and never really shown a passion for any kind of progressive policy will outperform a party that actually ran on Hope and Change?

Yes, I do, and while I appreciate your cynical position, I respectfully hope I'm proven right and you're proven wrong.

She and Biden have always just been a placeholder to keep Trump out. They were never really expected to do anything popular.

And you're entitled to your opinion, but from my perspective, that's been Biden's deal. He's the "not Trump" placeholder candidate, and Kamala has simply been along for the ride. I have hope for what she can do when she's the one actually calling the shots.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I respectfully hope I’m proven right and you’re proven wrong.

You and me, both. But I've been living through this bait-and-switch pattern since Carter.

Biden was absolutely the worst of the lot, but hey maybe his VP will be different.

He’s the “not Trump” placeholder candidate, and Kamala has simply been along for the ride.

The entire pitch for Biden since January has been "if you don't zealously support him with all of your heart, you're going to let Trump do a fascism and destroy the entire American democratic system".

He is explicitly and unequivocally running as a block to Trump. And the only reason he got ousted was due to his failure in this role.

The Dems know this, they know their base will vote for a ham sandwich to keep Trump out of office, and so they're free to sell out to corporate interest at every opportunity on the grounds that voters don't have another choice.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

They better not show up in my donut shop.

[-] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 4 points 2 months ago

TERM. LIMITS.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024

94 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5240 readers

541 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

silence7@slrpnk.net