523
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 163 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Duped? How? By getting paid?

[-] Atsur@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago

Oopsie I was just so confused by this giant bag of cash!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RicoBerto@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 2 months ago

My job dupes me into coming in every night by uploading some wacky numbers to my bank account every two weeks. I fall for it every time.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

The whacky numbers in your bank account are quite convenient to have tbf

[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 29 points 2 months ago

The U.S. Justice Department doesn’t allege any wrongdoing by the influencers, some of whom it says were given false information about the source of the company’s funding. Instead, it accuses two employees of RT, a Russian state media company, of funneling nearly $10 million to a Tennessee-based content creation company for Russia-friendly content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

By getting paid

More like bribed out of their minds. They absolutely KNEW that what they were doing wasn't worth a fraction of the money was handed to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago

How does one dupe the willing?

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Bags of money!

Apparently they were duped into thinking the money came from pro-Russian US conservatives or something like that instead of directly from the source.

I disagree that they were duped in any way since the pro Russian messaging was still pro Russian messaging and the source of the money is not important.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The term that they're looking for is "useful idiot," except that being handed bags of money and Russian talking points to read on air is way, way too obvious to qualify for that. "Traitorous sleazebag," maybe. "Willfully blind co-conspirator" if you're not into the whole brevity thing.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 14 points 2 months ago

It's weird how only the Republicans are duped.

[-] MuAraeOracle@real.lemmy.fan 12 points 2 months ago

Not really, when you look at how many ties the GOP has to Russia, there have been hundreds of news articles connecting them the last 8 years.

They even visited Russia on 4th July 2018 https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/395719-gop-senators-visited-moscow-on-july-4/

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] ALittleSticious@lemm.ee 54 points 2 months ago

God i hate popular media - always trying to change the narrative with these misleading headlines.

Being a paid russian asset isn’t being duped. I hope those things rot in prison.

[-] Mobiledecay@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Duped. Yes, of course. That's it. 😏

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] randompasta@lemmy.today 53 points 2 months ago

Duped! Completely fooled! Hoodwinked! Who could have seen that coming??

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 29 points 2 months ago

thanks for the money...

[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Bamboozled! Foisted! Smeckledorfed!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 months ago

The coordinated messaging all emphasizing how this was accidental and these longtime trolls didn't know (or bother to ask) where the money coming from is... something.

[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 9 points 2 months ago

Isn't that just trickling down from the DOJ though? The article says:

The U.S. Justice Department doesn’t allege any wrongdoing by the influencers, some of whom it says were given false information about the source of the company’s funding. Instead, it accuses two employees of RT, a Russian state media company, of funneling nearly $10 million to a Tennessee-based content creation company for Russia-friendly content.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 months ago

True, but these people have been completely aligned with Kremlin talking points for years, and I wish the article and others would take the time to point that out. I'm sure it can be phrased in an ambiguous enough way that the reader can draw conclusions without it being libelous.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Nazis are always treated with kid gloves by the US "justice" system. Same as it ever was.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Okay, then the DOJ grasping at any flimsy excuse to avoid indicting the traitorous right-wing influencers themselves is... something.

That better?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Third straight election, you say? I wonder if there is any other factor shared by the last three elections? Like maybe one of the candidates has been the same person?

[-] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Being bought is different than being duped.

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

I don't think most of them were duped. It's been exceptionally obvious for years. I mean I guess some of them are dumb enough not to realize, but most are just taking advantage of the money and power.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that's like saying Old spice sponsors and influencer to sell Old spice then saying that they were duped to work for Proctor and Gamble.

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 months ago

“Duped” is doing some heavy lifting in that sentence.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

"I'm shocked, shocked to find that Russia was funding me to spout these talking points!"

"Your gratuities, sir"

"Oh, thank you very much."

[-] Juice@midwest.social 27 points 2 months ago

Aw crap they tricked us with money again

[-] m750@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Duped? Complicit

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 months ago

i'm always getting duped to say obvious pro russian talking points after taking a bunch of money and signing a contract to say obvious pro russian talking points. hate when it happens, honestly.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 23 points 2 months ago

Pool, a journalist-turned-YouTuber who first gained public attention for livestreaming the Occupy Wall Street protests, hosted Trump on his podcast earlier this year.

Johnson is an outspoken Trump supporter and internet personality who was fired from BuzzFeed after the company found evidence he’d plagiarized other works.

So these two were formally "journalists", and should know at least something about confirming sources and information before publishing, or in this case I guess making a video/podcast, about the topic given them by this company that wanted to just give them hundreds of thousands of dollars. And maybe look into why a company would pay you that kind of money out of nowhere if they were supplying all the talking points, and they just want you to say them into a camera? Maybe?

I think anyone with any background in media should see right through something like this, and has no leg to stand on when crying "we had no idea!". They saw a check and all morals/questions went out the window.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 21 points 2 months ago

So their excuse is: “we are too dumb to go to prison”

Guilty by reason of Gullible? I’m going to use this, should they ever find myself in court.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

No, it's worse than that. That's the DOJ's excuse for refusing to indict the traitorous influencers themselves and only going after their Russian handlers.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

They weren't duped. They gleefully and knowingly pushed anti-American propaganda in support of the Project 2025 Handmaid's Tale christofascist theocratic dictatorship. They knew where the money was coming from but didn't care.

[-] wick@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think in the indictment Lauren Chen and her husband referred to the company/investors as "the Russians" so those two at least were 100% not duped, they are just traitors.

Lauren has been fired from a news org she write for.

Idk if those two and the other useful idiots broke any laws though, the indictment is just for foreign agent registration stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

They never expressed any curiosity about where the money was coming from?

Pull the other one, it's got bells on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago
[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago
[-] ReducedArc@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
523 points (96.1% liked)

News

23367 readers
2966 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS