this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
38 points (97.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

24736 readers
1844 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Takes 1 more character, that's bloat.

[–] theory@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

Thanks, i hate it

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

I saw while(i --> 0) in someone else's code and thought wth is this --> operator? Then I realized it's while(i-- > 0) and thought cool, I gotta do this!

[–] blazarious@mylem.me 1 points 2 years ago

Someone forgot to set their phone to do not disturb

[–] muxelplexer@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

this is incredibly cursed. i love it.

[–] mfz@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't the evaluated value different from the expression? i++ returns the value of i before increasing. i-=-1 would return the value after it has been increased. Wouldn't it be more correct to make it equal to ++i

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the languages I know, i-=-1 or x=3 are not expressions, but rather statements, so they do not evaluate to a value.

So, this would be a compiler error:

a = (x=3)
[–] mfz@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Well, not all languages allow for fun programming :)

[–] maiskanzler@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that's why post- and pre-increment is non-existant in Python and Rust. It's an easy source for bugs for a noncritical abbreviation🤷

[–] Knusper@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago

They're especially also a source of bugs, because they encourage manually incrementing indices and manually accessing array positions, which is almost never actually sensible.