39

Since it looks like Firefox might not be a good option for the long haul due to some disappointing decisions from its management, I'm on the lookout for privacy-friendly alternatives. I came across Cromite, which is based on Chromium and has an ad blocker. Has anyone tried it? From what I've seen, the built-in ad blocker seems pretty basic and not very customizable. Still, I think any alternative we choose should be based on Chromium, especially if we don’t want to wait ages for Ladybird.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rose@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 month ago

That logic makes absolutely no sense. Look into Google before you take issue with Mozilla.

[-] blibla@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

i get where you are coming from but right now i am more mad at mozilla xD

[-] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 month ago

Keep your eye on the prize. Google and Mozilla aren’t even in the same area code of shit. Firefox is the obvious answer.

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago
[-] Fijxu@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I use it every day and I never had problems with it. It's pretty OK.but I would like to have something more powerful like Unblock Origin which is available on Firefox for android but the performance is not that good and I didn't like how it worked

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Have u tried mull? Ive had no problems with it so far.

[-] Stomata@buddyverse.one 2 points 1 month ago

It has site isolation problem and it's slow 😮‍💨 . it used to be my favourite

[-] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

It is an important hardening feature, but the browser isn't completely insecure without it assuming it is up-to-date and that you aren't on the receiving end of targeted/zero-day attacks. Furthermore (in Chromium) with isolated renderer processes there is still some inherent attack surface of the main process that can allow a single exploit, just like in Firefox.

https://divestos.org/pages/browsers

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago
[-] Undertaker@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago
[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I use cromite, and it's good, but the adblocker is unable to handle the more aggressive popups and ads, whereas firefox + uBO does fine.

Thus, cromite is my main browser and I use firefox for... other stuff. This setup is mainly because I'm too lazy to install Mull or another firefox based browser to be my main option.

[-] d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Mull and Fennec are way more obvious android browsers to switch to if Firefox doesnt meet your privacy needs/concerns.

[-] blibla@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

for now yes, but what I'm arguing is that they might not be in the long run

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Well, let's see what happens first. If we'll be able to disable all the junk, it'll be okay.

I still wanna support diversity among browser engines.

[-] blibla@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

i think it's better to jump ship now so that they get scared and stop the enshitification early before it s too late

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I don't think that's possible. 😅

People have been jumping ship for a decade, and it hasn't helped. They'll probably have to sink first, and by then it might be too late if someone else has filled the void.

I, for one, won't be coming back if it comes to that.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago

Bromite used to be the only non-built-in browser recommended by GrapheneOS, and I've not seen anything bad posted since it became Cromite. Apparently Firefox on Android still doesn't have site isolation so it's still a toss-up between security and the ominous shadow of Google.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It didnt become Cromite. Bromite was abandoned and a ~~single person or a couple~~ regular maintainer forked it and created Cromite, embedding code from AdBlockPlus etc.

The guy who forked it (uazo)was a regular maintainer of bromite

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Well that is another pro Cromite.

I will remove the comment then, as I honestly couldnt find anything making it better than Chrome

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I know, I think a project dying and continuing as a fork still counts though

[-] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it's still a toss-up between security and the ominous shadow of Google.

No content blocker = no security. (Not quite no, but it's very critical.)

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Fortunately I think they both have content blocking available. Also I set my private DNS to block ads in every app.

[-] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I used both Cromite and Brave. Ended up using Brave (disabling all the crypto things) since it offers better handling in ad blocks and anti fingerprint.

[-] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Brave is shady crypto infested spyware.

[-] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

If you are referring to the crypto side of things you can easily disable them. I don't see any spyware TBH.

[-] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you look up what they have done in the past, you'll know.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Mozilla is adopting a ton of the things that were wrong with Brave. Recently, Brave criticized Mozilla's PPA data collection for being too centralized, which implies to me that otherwise, there's a lot of overlap between the two allegedly "private" systems. I don't trust Brave telemetry, but it seems not even they can come up with many ways to differentiate themselves from Mozilla.

If they're different somehow, I would love to know how.

In a way other than accrued trust or distrust, that is. At this point, I don't think Mozilla is owed any inherent trust.

[-] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did I ever talk about Mozilla? Who said Mozilla or stock Firefox was good? They're ass. Mozilla is ass and stock firefox is worse than stock chrome. I wouldn't use Librewolf if it wasn't for the monopoly and ublock origin support. Not because Librewolf is bad but because I know that Firefox's security sucks and Gecko is slow indeed, but now not even privacy focused chromium browsers are an option because of manifest v3, great. At this point, I am hoping for Ladybird to be something to look forward to, because even the alternative to chromium is shit.

Brave is not any better. It should be obvious for anyone enough to understand how shady brave devs are, when they:

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

No argument from me there. I didn't mean to come across this argumentative, I just wanted to point it out here because of the context of this post (someone looking to move away from Firefox). And because, to me, ad telemetry still is a black box.

[-] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago
[-] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

The ones that you refer to is for them to make money. Ok so why is that bad? Do you pay to use their browser? No. Are they funded by Google like Mozilla is? No. Does this tactic interfere with your browsing since you can disable these shit? No.

I'm not defending Brave at all but one should be criticizing objectively.

Ladybird is at least 2 years out from any production version. And they still have funding I think.

So comparing all browser I believe they least shit is Brave. Librewolf is fine too and in terms of speed it's not that far behind and in real life no one will give a shit or even notice. It all comes down to usability in the browsing experience.

[-] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Justifying url injections for money? Ads are one thing, but anyone that knew that their browser was "secretly" injecting stuff into the url would be creeped the hell out. I don't see how this browser is private at all.

[-] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

It was injecting specific urls when one was using their crypto shit. The got caught and corrected it. Again, not saying this is justified but among the others I find Brave the least shit. It's the only browser that can trick effectively coveryourtracks.eff.org

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

It's turned off by default

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

~~I heard that Cromite is shady, and recommendations pro Brave instead.~~

I cant find the sources, this topic is really complicated, brave is shady too.

Which is crazy as Brave is so much more bloated.

Mulch is a based browser for regular Android, close behind Vanadium in features and release cadence, but without patches that break regular Android and only work on GrapheneOS.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago

What have you heard about Cromite which makes it more shady than Brave!?

[-] nuclear1986@feddit.nl 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)
[-] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago

Oh wow, not ideal

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Honestly somewhere in GrapheneOS forums but I was not alble to find it.

Just that they embed code for their adblocking engine that is by ABP. Which may be fair, may be not.

GrapheneOS people recommend Brave, but no idea why, apart from the privacy advantages over Vanadium.

[-] 68silver@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

I use Iceraven with UBO on my android devices.

[-] Stomata@buddyverse.one 1 points 1 month ago

I recently shifted from Firefox based Browsers. I'm currently testing cromite. One issue is it's ad blocker is not that perfect. It has easy list as it's main blacklist. I think it would be really nice if they add ublock origin , ad guard or other blocklist. Though I added next dns as secure dns in the Browser . it has all the blocklist i need

[-] Stomata@buddyverse.one 2 points 1 month ago

So i just found that you can add custom filters . i added stevenblack You guys can also try it https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/hosts

FYI this increases your fingerprintability

[-] Stomata@buddyverse.one 1 points 1 month ago

How actually

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

You can add any filter list you want to it. You can also use GreaseMonkey user scripts.

I still prefer Mull, but I keep Cromite installed

[-] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16263 readers
1 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS