172
submitted 7 hours ago by PortoPeople@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jordan117@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I genuinely wonder how much of the rise of this kind of belligerent stupidity can be traced back to widespread, low-level lead poisoning decades ago that's starting to manifest in earnest now.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

Combine that with 40 years of Republicans slashing education funding and you’re on to something.

[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

microplastics, everywhere from the balls to the brain.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 9 points 5 hours ago

There is one person that built the foundation to all of this: Rush Limbaugh. The right is always right and everyone else is lying.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

We're not arguing on bad faith you are!

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 33 points 7 hours ago

Oh it’s definitely similar to a disease. It attacks the area of the brain that sources intelligence and common sense.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 25 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I've been calling it a mental illness for at least a decade. I suspect it's similar to narcissism and empathetic impairment, but there is a clear corruption to the way they process logic, as evidenced by the constant double-think.

"my abortion was different"

"won't someone think of the children" but also let em starve and die in a mass shooting.

"Trans and gays are pedophiles" but also my teams pedos and sex criminals have my undying support.

There are literally thousands of examples like this. There isn't a day that goes by where I don't see them display some glaring contradiction.

I consider religion — which teaches you to trust your feefees, "just have faith", and reject critical thought — to be the main source of this logical corruption and mental illness.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

I feel like common sense is more a standard mental immune system function that helps prevent the infection from taking hold. These are susceptible populations, though, essentially immunocompromised.

So, I suppose we need to take some MAGA, weaken it with formaldehyde or something, and then inject that into people's brains to give the brain a chance to fight back before it gets overwhelmed.

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 hours ago

So, I suppose we need to take some MAGA, weaken it with formaldehyde or something, and then inject that into people's brains to give the brain a chance to fight back before it gets overwhelmed.

I've been trying to convince anti-vaxxers that it isn't the medicine, but the micro plastics that are causing all the "new diseases" and being able to diagnose more autistic kids. I would rather them believe that it is caused by plastics and not medicine. I think being anti-plastic is better than anti-vax.

Try to out conspiracy them. Tell them that the anti-vax movement was created by Obama to kill off Republicans.

[-] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 11 points 6 hours ago

No its pandemic. All of the right wing nuts are colluding to return to its weirdo cult Nazi heritage.

Spoiler alert: the uniforms went away but the ideology remained thanks in part to the western racists.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 19 points 7 hours ago

I've been around Maga folks and I haven't yet caught it. Maybe I'm immune? Or maybe it's the skirts I wear. We need to force Maga adherents into skirts so that they get better.

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 hours ago

Their leader tries to force himself into skirts. Forcing them to wear skirts might work though.

This was such a disappointing article.

Yes, I agree with all of the things said and will be voting for Kamala. But this is a former WHO epidemiologist, so do we get information on how we would apply the learnings of epidemiology to treat this epidemic of irrational, self-harming personality-worship? Do we get any diagnostic characteristics? Any way to contain the spread? Any practical guidance whatsoever?

Nope, just a low-effort rant.

This is just another gawker, pointing and gasping at the slow-motion trainwreck of Trump running into democracy. I really really wish some of these articles would actually try to propose solutions.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

What are the solutions though? I don't think this descent stops until the MAGA crowd gets most of what they want and realize it sucks ass to live that way which is going to come with a lot of pain for everyone. They're clearly not willing or able to learn from history, think through policies without experiencing the negative consequences personally, or distinguish reality from propaganda and/or wishful thinking. What options for resolution does that leave us with?

The only thing I can see that might work is fighting them off until enough of the old folks in their camp die and hoping the younger crowd doesn't follow in their footsteps. That's not a particularly appealing plan but I'm not sure what else is on the table.

[-] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 6 minutes ago)

What are the solutions though? I don’t think this descent stops until the MAGA crowd gets most of what they want...

That's where we're headed, sure. What we need is someone to explain (a) the forces at play at some deeper level, and (b) tell us how we fix it.

That's why this is a disappointing article: The headline proposes an interesting idea - treat the Trump/MAGA mental illness as a disease - and then immediately forgets about it. We deal with diseases all the time, and even if mental disease is a challenge to diagnose and treat, it's a great framework! Studies may be able to show most MAGA disease vectors are people with X, Y and Z verifiable, objective psychological disorders or features. They may theorize that if we treat those disorders, we can save those people from this type of self-harm (which is what MAGA is at this point). That's a fantastic concept! Similar to the far too unexplored concept of treating this as a cult deprogramming. If we work the problem maybe we can come up with a solution that doesn't involve fascism winning, or us all killing each other in a civil war.

Instead, it's just "this is bad...really bad." Ok, thank you Mr. WHO epidemiologist.

(I know, I'm not helping either - but I'm not smart enough in epidemiology, or cult deprogramming. Comment posting is my therapy, nothing more.)

[-] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago

I’m vaguely hopeful that continuing to lose at the ballot box will de-motivate them enough for this current frothing at the mouth to die out.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Salon - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Salon:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.salon.com/2024/10/15/brain-flaws-understanding-maga-as-an-epidemic-disease/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
172 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3957 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS