367
Vance denies Trump lost 2020 election
(www.axios.com)
Vance for prison
People are saying it
Shouldn’t he already be there? I’m just asking questions
Spoiler alert: the plan is to limp Trump into office, JD slaps him out with the 25th and then him a Peter Thiel measure the oval office for drapes.
Like they kept saying the Democrats were going to do.
Yet again, it's projection.
Fun anecdote: Edward Snowdon blocked me on twitter for asking him why his bff thiel (sbowden loves thiel) couldn't "rescue" him from his Russian home.
PS Brave browser is thiel's baby.
And an out of my ass educated speculation: thiel is (one part of) satoshi nakamoto.
sbowden loves thiel
Got a source for this?
No, Snowdon. Which is actually just Donald Trump in winter.
They'll go 2 years 1 day with Trump so Vance can try for 9 years 364 days as president.
While an insightful suggestion, this presupposes that they won't figuratively or literally throw out the constitution before that point.
Why bother? There wouldn't be any more voting in 2028.
Bingo! Then the tech bros carve out their personal kingdoms.
Dunno what a Peter Thiel is... but that does seem to be the plan, and it's probably why they chose someone who hates Trump over a Trump loyalist. The former is more likely to oust the guy, the latter would just say "Oh he's playing 5D Chess, don't worry, he'll own those libs."
There is no plan.
The worst lie we tell about fascists is that they're organized.
So he's ineligible to run again, then?
He continued, "No. I think there were serious problems in 2020. Did Trump lose the election in 2020? Not by the words that I would use."
That is a totally normal way to say things by the words that I would use.
When I said “let’s kill them all” what I really meant was “hooray for ice cream”
I'm pretty sure this is an actual trump quote from yesterday.
"From my point of view, the Jedi are evil!"
The ultimate proof that he DID lose the 2020 Election?
The fact that he's running again, if he actually believed it was rigged he'd be using his resources to expose the game or reform the system so that the "cheating" couldn't happen again.
Instead he's running again, which means he believes he has a chance of winning, and if he doesn't he looks like a fool for playing in a game that he "knew" was rigged against him, and if he wins.... he blows up his big "Biden cheated" lie
And sadly, he might actually fucking win...
I hate this country
Look, just vote, okay. That's all I'm asking you to do, vote for Harris.
So if he didn't lose the election, that means he's already been elected president for 2 terms and is ineligible to run in 2024.
Oh, they'll weasel their way around that. "He was elected but was not allowed to serve by those cheating Democrats, and the rule is a president can't serve more than 2 terms" blah blah blah
Actually the rule very clearly states that no one can be elected more than twice for the presidency.
So looking at it from the Trump campaign’s perspective, assuming this is their official stance, they are running an illegal campaign to elect a president for a third time.
That's true, but I was implying that the Trump campaign will just claim the rule is "serve", or claim "serve" was meant, not caring what the actual rule is.
He's already "joked" about being allowed to run for 3 terms or more... The rules don't apply to Trump, just everyone else.
Then he should stop running as he'd be going for a 3rd term, right? That's unconstitutional.
Oh who am I kidding, rules are for the poor.
And this just further galvanized their base. I'm not looking forward to the next couple months
If he loses in expecting another January 6th but since the security will be more prepared, more people will die
I'm not looking forward to the next couple ~~months~~ years
FTFY
I get that, but regardless the road to the election is gonna be fucked. If he somehow sleezes his way in we're all fucked. But is Kamala wins the first year won't be pleasant because of the other side
I plan on going hyper-vigilant recording and doxxing all the chuds.
Justice is slow, but that cunt never forgets a damn thing.
Axios - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Axios:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.axios.com/2024/10/16/jd-vance-trump-2020-election-denial
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
367 points (98.7% liked)
politics
19144 readers
2327 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS