I’ve rarely seen a source as sketchy as that…
This is literally the blog of some dude in Texas.
Guess I should unsubscribe Popular Info and The Big Newsletter by the same logic
I mean, maybe? But in the meantime, don't cite them as primary sources, ok?
I will cite the ones that can back what they are reporting and least likely to defend shitty stuff
Considering all other articles about SB 799 is trying to defend Newsom and this one doesn't, and this one links Sen. Portantino response (one example https://news.yahoo.com/newsom-vetoes-unemployment-bill-strikers-010632833.html)
I know which one I be using
The one that confirms your previously held bias. Great way to choose news sources.
OH NO, I have a bias
I am just so bias sharing smaller groups and subscribing to their newsletters and what not, especially as they come up content I like better and provided sources
Politics
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.