269
submitted 20 hours ago by Ste41th@lemmy.ml to c/news@lemmy.world
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Let's all take a moment to not at the bottom of the article that it says since 1990 only 83 people have died in such incidents. That is a goal the US could never hope to achieve in my lifetime.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

So any background on what the cops knew at the time? It says the car was reported to have been involved in a shooting at a school... but no gus were found and it was night I think. Also I have heard others say (but haven't seen in an article) that the car was stolen and the guy who died had a rap sheet. I doubt the cops knew who he was, but they might have known the car was stolen. But if they knew none of these things, that would be a pretty stark picture.

[-] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

He was supposedly a “Core member of a gang, and a gunman in a nightclub shooting” days before this incident unfolded.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Well, is that what happened or is that the narrative of the police?

[-] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Check my recent post, I’ve posted the article relating to the club shooting.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago

The trial hinged on the following 17 seconds, which saw the Audi reverse a short distance, hitting an unmarked car behind, then accelerate forward, reaching an estimated 12mph before colliding with the BMW and a parked Tesla.

Armed officers were heard shouting "go, go, go" and "armed police, get out of the f***ing car," as they surrounded the vehicle, in footage played in court.

The Audi then reversed at 8mph, hitting the unmarked Volvo behind, and was stationary as Mr Blake pulled the trigger of his carbine less than a second later

Some context for people who won't click the article

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago

Police consider a moving vehicle a deadly weapon. Thus, if you’re trying to flee from them by driving, especially in an erratic manner, you’re considered to be wielding a deadly weapon and they can thereby respond with lethal force.

Agree or disagree, this is the logic.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

Even calling it logic is pushing it.

"Pretense", "excuse", or "bloodlust-induced delusion" would be more accurate.

By that "logic", they'd be justified in murdering every single motorist for at some point swerving unexpectedly.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

You know that people are killed by cars, like, all the time right?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

People are killed by their bodies much more often, want people to be murdered on the street for operating THOSE "erratically" too?

There's simply no justification for shooting someone who's not imminently and acutely endangering the life of someone else.

Driving into another car at 15mph does NOT do that.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

You know that you can just let the guy go now, defuse the situation, then pick him up later without having to kill him, right?

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 17 hours ago

Keep fighting for justice, because the human world is not designed to deliver it easily.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

It's actually designed very much to not deliver justice. The people who designed it are often the ones benefiting from its dysfunction.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
269 points (97.9% liked)

News

23207 readers
3127 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS