251

So if you vote on election day but your ballot doesn't get counted in time I guess your shit outta luck?

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 126 points 1 week ago

On another discussion post someone from there commented on that fact and I couldn't believe it. No early voting, once the poll closes that's it even if there's a line, and now (for apparently the first time in history) even a late ballot in the mail is invalid. Republicans who still love their country should be outraged at this, but I guess as long as they're winning it doesn't matter.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Anyone who loves their country is no longer republican.

[-] Infinite@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

At least, the ones that love and understand their country.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Wrong. They love a country they understand perfectly, it just isn't real.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

And are those Republicans that still love their country here in the room with us now?

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Election hasn't even happened yet and Missouri already has under full fascist control over their voters. A few state-designed delays and any votes from any county or polling site go straight into the trash can.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 5 points 1 week ago

Wait, i'm confused by US election rule, how long does the ballot open if there's no early voting?

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

All 50 states have different rules. All of them. There are federal laws that apply, but our very slanted supreme court has gutted most of them.

Of the states, some are excellent, most are sane, some are insane.

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

The article seemed to state this was specifically about mailed ballots. Any source regarding being in line at poll close?

[-] taipan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I think I was blocked from there for daring to say all genocide is bad, and we can criticize democrats. Anyway, I can't see any comments there. Thank you for posting the link, though.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago

5th Circuit if anyone was wondering (not that it wasn't obvious)

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

Oldham could just as easily fashion a bullshit reason dressed in fake legalese that only Republican votes count because the US is a constitutional republic.

These worthless jerks are always on about state's rights. except when they aren't, and cannot put together a legitimate argument either way.

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago

So now we know for sure the election is rigged

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wdym clearly this is just how the founding fathers intended for our constitutional Republic to work. /s

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

So if you vote on election day but your ballot doesn't get counted in time I guess your shit outta luck?

Not exactly. This applies to mail in ballots with the correct postage date but received after election Day. It's bullshit IMO. If you got your vote in the mail by election Day then it should count.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Good thing DeJoy is still (fucking SOMEHOW) in charge of USPS so I'm sure he'll ensure timely delivery.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

It does make sense in a way, but you would think they would give a little bit of leeway.

They shouldn't have to wait like 2 weeks before calling the results to make sure all the mail in votes have made it in, but maybe at least give it a day or two.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

The cases where mail in ballots received after election day actually make a difference is negligible. This is a non-issue, and elections are generally called well before all votes are counted anyways.

The more important principle here is that all legal votes should be counted. This is just another tool in the arsenal of vote suppression enthusiasts on the right to use when the time is right (GOP in power again so they can aggressively ratfuck the USPS again just before the election).

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

We just had an election in my area where mail in ballots flipped a seat which was already considered won by conservatives and will potentially be the deciding factor between a minority and majority government, and they weren't counted officially until almost 10 days after election day.

[-] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

It’s just voter suppression. Just like the reason every state doesn’t have mail in ballots or how Election Day isn’t a holiday or how we don’t have the technology to do vote online. It’s just voter suppression. Like we have technology to deposit checks instantly yet we can’t have a system to vote. It’s fucking sad and depressing. The US is a joke.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago

Good thing the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act a while back...

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Democrats could have passed the John Lewis Voting Rights Act to restore voting protections. But the Jim Crow Filibuster was more important.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
251 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4579 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS