27
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] count_of_monte_carlo@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

I’ll echo the other replies that the gravitational waves from black hole mergers have been detected by LIGO. In fact, the 2017 Nobel Prize in physics was awarded to members of this collaboration specifically for this feat.

We haven’t (yet) seen a pair of black holes collide using light directly, but the gravitational waves have been perfectly consistent with general relativity calculations. Here’s a video from LIGO that shows what one of these simulations looks like, for a simulation that reproduces a detected gravitational wave.

As an aside, right around the time the LIGO team was awarded the Nobel prize, they detected the collision of a pair of neutron stars. They alerted the astronomy community to the direction they saw the signal from, and within a day there were telescope observations of light from the kilonova that resulted from the collision. Ultimately various sensors recorded optical light, infrared, ultraviolet, gamma rays, and radio waves being emitted from the explosion. The hope is that someday we’ll get lucky enough to see similar photon signatures from a black hole merger!

[-] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

The LIGO video is beautiful and terrifying all at the same time.

[-] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

We know that black hole mergers are a thing, as LIGO has detected gravity waves from these exact events.

To get too much more specific, we need to ponder the mass of the black holes and their distance of separation.

You did specify that these black holes were of equal size. They would orbit each other, potentially for billions of years, just like any two other massive objects and how these orbits behaved would depend on their mass, orbital distance, relative velocity and the gravitational influence of any other large bodies. For example, two 30 solar mass black holes orbiting close to Sagittarius A* (our galaxy's central super massive black hole) would have a very different orbital pattern from the same two black holes orbiting each other in intergalactic space.

[-] april@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

Black holes merge. It doesn't matter what size they are. It's not that the bigger one eats the smaller one they just merge.

[-] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Are we advanced enough to have seen this yet? Not calling you a liar just sounds interesting to watch..

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 11 hours ago

Yes, LIGO has observed the gravitational wave “chirp” from two black holes orbiting each other closer and closer until they join

[-] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I am on my phone at the moment is it LGO or L I G O?

[-] april@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

It stands for Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory!

The black holes are so big and fast when they spiral in and merge that they literally create waves in spacetime which change the length of things by a tiny amount as they pass by us and LIGO is able to measure when the two arms of it change length by nanometers and that's where we got the signal.

There's also The Event Horizon Telescope which made radio images of the black hole at the center of our galaxy. We haven't been able to catch a merger with this though.

[-] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 16 hours ago

pretty sure that we can't "watch" a black hole at all, since we need light to see and light cannot escape a black hole

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 8 hours ago

We can see them from the luminance of their accretion disks, or via gravitational lensing, or polar radiation jets, or gravitational waves

[-] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Ok dumb question if we can't see or watch a black hole how do we know what they do or even exist?

[-] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 15 hours ago

you should really read the Wikipedia article on black holes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

some paragraphs you might find relevant to your question:

By nature, black holes do not themselves emit any electromagnetic radiation other than the hypothetical Hawking radiation, so astrophysicists searching for black holes must generally rely on indirect observations. For example, a black hole's existence can sometimes be inferred by observing its gravitational influence on its surroundings.

David Finkelstein, in 1958, first published the interpretation of "black hole" as a region of space from which nothing can escape. Black holes were long considered a mathematical curiosity; it was not until the 1960s that theoretical work showed they were a generic prediction of general relativity. The discovery of neutron stars by Jocelyn Bell Burnell in 1967 sparked interest in gravitationally collapsed compact objects as a possible astrophysical reality. The first black hole known was Cygnus X-1, identified by several researchers independently in 1971.

The presence of a black hole can be inferred through its interaction with other matter and with electromagnetic radiation such as visible light. Any matter that falls toward a black hole can form an external accretion disk heated by friction, forming quasars, some of the brightest objects in the universe. Stars passing too close to a supermassive black hole can be shredded into streamers that shine very brightly before being "swallowed."[11] If other stars are orbiting a black hole, their orbits can be used to determine the black hole's mass and location. Such observations can be used to exclude possible alternatives such as neutron stars. In this way, astronomers have identified numerous stellar black hole candidates in binary systems and established that the radio source known as Sagittarius A*, at the core of the Milky Way galaxy, contains a supermassive black hole of about 4.3 million solar masses.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

Yes! And this happening is exactly what allowed gravity waves to first be detected

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
27 points (96.6% liked)

Ask Science

8641 readers
69 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS