48
submitted 22 hours ago by PumpkinDrama@reddthat.com to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Hello, I'm looking for a new distro that aligns with my privacy preferences and offers a wide range of packages without requiring me to search for PPAs, similar to Manjaro. I've grown uneasy about Manjaro's decision to collect unique data like MAC addresses and disk serial numbers by default, even if it's for diagnostic purposes.

In light of this, I'd like to ask for your recommendations on a Linux distro that meets the following criteria:

  1. No opt-out telemetry: I'm looking for a distro that doesn't collect any unique data by default.
  2. Access to a wide range of packages: I prefer a distro that offers a vast repository of packages, so I don't have to search for PPAs or third-party repositories.
  3. User-friendly: I'm not a fan of complicated configurations or steep learning curves, so a distro with a user-friendly approach would be ideal.

I'm curious to hear any recommendations you might have. Thanks!

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] icogniito@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 hours ago

Well if you don’t want plain arch I’d go with cachyos or just endeavouros

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Take the plunge into the Void.

[-] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

Let go your earthly tether Enter the Void empty, and become wind

[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 hours ago

Another vote for Endeavour OS here

[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago
[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago
[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 40 points 16 hours ago

EndeavorOS. It's like manjaro but not bad.

[-] Rogers@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 hours ago

Came here to say the same. Such a great distro, and it'll be an easy switch from manjaro.

I've been running it with btrfs and it has been rock solid stability wise. If you go btrfs I recommend grub btrfs for easy boot time snapshots and btrfs-assistant in the aur if you want a GUI to manage btrfs maintenance.

[-] eruchitanda@lemmy.world 25 points 17 hours ago

If you're already used to Arch-based systems, and enjoy the convenience of the AUR, what about EndeavourOS?

It's basically Arch with GUI install scripts, and a different wallpaper.

[-] eruchitanda@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

I saw one commenter suggested Arch itself. IMO it's even a better idea than EOS.

archinstall doesn't have GUI, but it has very nice TUI (like what you have when you use htop), and you could finish selecting the options in very few minutes.

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 3 points 16 hours ago

Maybe I'm a dumbass and it's my fault, but I find that archinstall always has an issue when you run it. It's easier to install arch manually than run the and troubleshoot.

[-] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Is there any distro that automatically collect data? Every distro I've tried asked directly on install or at first boot

[-] tomsh@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

I think you are looking for a distribution with KDE and flatpak by default

[-] Blxter@lemmy.zip 51 points 22 hours ago

I switched to EOS Endeavour OS. I don't think it has data collection

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 29 points 22 hours ago

It doesn't, and offers an even friendlier experience than Manjaro IMO

[-] Classy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 20 hours ago

Endeavour has been an amazing distro for me, noob Linuxer. I started on Ubuntu Cinnamon, then tried Mint, and ended here on Endeavour and I love it.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 35 points 22 hours ago

Use Arch Linux. There's a script called "archinstall" you can use after connecting to the internet, and it's basically a guided installer

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Fedora/Nobara.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 21 points 21 hours ago

EndeavourOS. I used Manjaro for 1.5 years before switching to EndeavourOS. (BTW before that I was also using Ubuntu for 13 years in row...) I couldn't be happier. It's closer to Archlinux and a bit more focused on terminal, but overall hassle free for me. Updates come quicker and not in batches like Manjaro did. Which means more often new versions of packages and no compatibility or other issues with AUR caused by Manjaro. What desktop environment did you use before? KDE is pretty good on EndeavourOS and what I would recommend.

  1. No opt-out or opt-in telemetry.
  2. Same package manager and repository from Archlinux.
  3. You have already experience with Manjaro and the Archlinux stuff, so going to a similar system like EndeavourOS makes sense. However its a bit more terminal oriented, with a few GUI related help.

Because of your prior experience with Manjaro, I think EndeavourOS is a good candidate you should have in mind.

[-] airikr@lemmy.ml 9 points 20 hours ago

I second EndeavourOS. It's so good!

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago

Is there something like an easy migration script, which would take packages and settings from my current install?

Ok, settings are mostly in my home anyway
Packages I can generate a list, and the manuals throw out the Manjaro stuff

Hmm...I'm having a laptop and a workstation running Manjaro and I really would like to make the switch, but can't tolerate much downtime, because both are machines for my work

So I'm looking for something to quickly setup everything as I had, without the need to remember everything and do it manually...

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 11 hours ago

You wouldn't be first who asks this. There are attempts and instructions how to do this, step by step. But I'm not confident enough to recommend any of those. Maybe they are outdated or your machine requires some setup which is not covered. I do not recommend doing this, but if you have no time to setup a new OS from scratch, then at least make a backup before attempting any of this.

I would ask those on the official EndeavourOS forum, which is active and helpful: https://forum.endeavouros.com/

[-] prunerye@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

Garuda. It's even easier than Manjaro. The theming can be a bit much, though.

[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 6 points 22 hours ago

openSUSE Tumbleweed has served me well for some time now. Maybe give it a look-see?

[-] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 4 points 19 hours ago

Second this. Tumbleweed is a great distro. Nearly everything you'll need can be found in default repos. Then there are several endorsed (semi) official add-on repos, and if that fails there's always OBS (opi is your friend for searching those).

[-] markstos@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

This coverage provides an example of what is sent, and it includes neither MACs nor HDD serial numbers.

https://ostechnix.com/manjaro-data-donor/

[-] furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 22 hours ago

cachyos is user friendly and based on arch

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago

It's not very stable though. It failed majorly in my case.

[-] BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 20 hours ago

You probably shouldn't be using an arch based distro if you want a user friendly experience.

I know there are things like manjaro and even endeavor os that are "arch but easy" but honestly I cannot in good faith recommend anything arch based for ease of use. Arch is a very fast moving distribution that usually has the newest packages but that isn't always good. There will eventually be a problem come up, maybe not often and maybe not that serious but in my personal opinion it's not worth it.

If you are wanting consistent ease of use and access to a lot of packages it's hard to beat the mainstream distros. Mint, Ubuntu, Fedora, (personal favorite) etc... and if you need something from arch repositories just use distrobox. You get access to all arch packages without the headache.

[-] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 21 hours ago

I really like Pop!_OS, AFAIK it doesn't have any telemetry. It's basically a Ubuntu fork but without the stupid Ubuntu stuff, and they're currently even working on their own Desktop Environment.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com -4 points 13 hours ago
[-] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 3 hours ago

LFS isn't a distribution. It's documentation only. (I know you were joking, but as an ex Reddit user I remembered my origin where I came from and got triggered hard.)

[-] ace_garp@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Trisquel is a fully 'Free as in freedom' distro.

Zero telemetry now or in the future.

Ubuntu based, so large FLOSS package repository.

Mate UI, simple user friendly layout.

* You will need hardware that works with fully free hardware drivers (for printer, WiFi, GPU etc). Drivers with binary-blobs are not included, due to potential security risks or spyware.

Test your hardware with a bootable USB.

[-] dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago

I think maybe Fedora but probably less software available

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 0 points 18 hours ago

Debian or Linux Mint

Arch would actually stand a chance.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
48 points (96.2% liked)

Linux

48179 readers
951 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS