472
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

This guy looks like insane Jack Torrance

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 30 points 3 hours ago

That should probably give him a huge assist within trump’s regime. They seem to love that type of thing.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 hours ago

Why do you think he was selected for AG?

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 34 points 7 hours ago

"These allegations are invented and would constitute false testimony to Congress," Gaetz said in response to ABC News' reporting.

AG Gaetz has his first case all lined up doesn't he?

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 187 points 10 hours ago

It's reasonably possible that trump likes him specifically because of these accusations.

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

A distraction perhaps

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 23 points 7 hours ago

What the hell are you talking about?

The president-elect has no idea what Gaetz looks like. The president-elect doesn’t even know Gaetz. The president-elect has never considered Gaetz for AG. The president-elect and Gaetz have never met.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago

For the uninformed, this is funny (and sarcasm) because there's mountains of evidence of them together. Besides, you know, picking him for AG. But he tries this defense all the time anyway, and people actually believe it.

Just like explicitly Trump calling up members of Congress to kill the bipartisan border bill, and then blaming the Democrats for not passing a border bill. They sold that one on the campaign trail too, and it worked.

Sources

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Every pick has been specifically chosen to be bad for their role.

Gaetz was 100% chosen for ATTORNEY GENERAL because of the accusations.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

Kinda feels like it. I wonder if the idea is to lower the bar for the next pick -- someone who sucks 75% as badly?

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I think he's testing loyalty in the party. I think he wants exactly who he has chosen.

[-] spacesatan@leminal.space 1 points 5 hours ago

He will never top Romney for head of the DOE. Yes yes it's bad to appoint people as a form of trolling but you have to admit sometimes he's funny.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 hours ago

Romney? Did you mean Perry?

[-] spacesatan@leminal.space 3 points 2 hours ago

Ah yeah that's right, Rick Perry. I'm glad I remember anything from the 2016 republican primary let alone which guy tanked his campaign with a debate gaffe.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago

Haha yeah he’s not too memorable otherwise but it’s a funny mistake since Romney and Trump hate each other.

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 54 points 9 hours ago

People who have baggage are easily controllable. Trump’s a mob boss, and he’s equally in the pocket of Putin. He’s used to these tactics.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 9 points 9 hours ago

Emperor Trump has a quiz for you dissidents: does this napkin smell like novichok? Answer honestly, you peasant.

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 82 points 9 hours ago

You know what's fucking infuriating? Nothing will happen to this fucker at all.

[-] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 19 points 7 hours ago

Nothing has happened to captain cheeto after he literally raped a child, so I can't say I'm surprised.

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

This shit shouldn't thought of as an "oh well". It's so fucked

[-] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 hours ago

Yeah no, I didn't mean it that way. Shit's completely fucked, I probably just have outrage fatigue.

[-] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Pretty sure outrage fatigue is how we lost this election unfortunately. The gish gallop from orange Satan NEVER ENDSSSSSS. Why is it such an effective strategy? I can't even listen to him talk without being repulsed

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 8 points 6 hours ago

Not saying you meant it that way, I'm saying 71 million Americans did. The more I think about it the more fucked it looks. Ngl, I hate the Democrats as much as the next person, but fuck, man, never in a million year would I vote for a person like Trump. It's fucking insanity. How can anyone listen to this man talk and say "ah, this is going to be a good president"? Just how?

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Or even just "this is going to be a not-horrific president? How?

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 6 points 5 hours ago

Two types of people voted for this dude, evil, selfish assholes who know exactly what he is and want to line up their pockets. And misinformed poor folks who are fooled by some outlet like MSM or something similar.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Nor should it! It's a wonderful thing no one will be so outraged by the utter lack of even a semblance of justice that they take matters into their own well-armed hands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 105 points 10 hours ago

The article mentions that he paid her to have sex with him at a party. That also makes it a sex trafficking crime. Also, IANAL but if the jurisdiction had an age of consent lower than 18, the sex trafficking part might negate that.

Also, Gaetz, who was born in 1982, was 35 at the time -- double her age and well outside the limits of any potential Romeo & Juliet laws.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Why would having sex at a party make it trafficking.

It's just paid for underage sex at a party.

Unless she was trafficked at the party by someone else, but I don't think that gets the person paying charged with trafficking? That would get the person who trafficked her that charge.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 3 points 3 hours ago

These parties were also said to be full of drugs (in addition to alcohol), which one could argue blurs any consent, especially when your looking at a 35/yr old man wanting to pay a 17/yr girl for sex. He was also a congressman by then, which also makes this a very lopsided power dynamic when arguing consent with a possibly intoxicated underage girl.

The woman's allegation regarding Gaetz became part of the investigation following claims by Greenberg, a former friend of Gaetz who is currently serving an 11-year prison sentence after reaching a deal with investigators in May 2021 in which he pleaded guilty to multiple federal crimes, including sex trafficking of the woman when she was a minor and introducing her to other "adult men" who also had sex with her when she was underage.

This part also make one more inclined to believe this has something to it, and probably more women that aren't coming forward because of all the death threats and toxicity projected at victims.

AND HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE OUR NEW AG!!

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 24 points 9 hours ago

Guy seriously broke the ‘half your age + seven’ rule. Off with his head.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

It's 1/7th your age plus 2, right?

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

I tend to stick to within 5ish years of my own age. Any more seems weird.

[-] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 18 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It becomes less meaningful as you get older.

The issue with a teen and a 30 yo is the balance of power. Kids that age haven't dated and figured out all the red flags making abuse much more likely and easy to pull off.

Once you're both over 30 it doesn't really make much difference apart from potential grossness which is super subjective.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I'm 48 and my girlfriend of several years is 31. We don't really think about it. But if I were 31 she would have been 14. It's not a pleasant thought in that context.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

I’m 45 and still feel the same way I did when I was younger. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

My sister and I had an agreement, I don't date anyone younger than her and she doesn't date anyone older than me. :)

We're 9 years apart.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 hours ago

I hope she’s your younger sister….

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Okay, but since you haven't established birth order, that could be either a really good rule or a really bad one.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, sorry, I'm older. :)

I married someone 5 years younger than me, 4 years older than her.

TBH, I don't know how old her husband is. Pretty sure he's younger than me.

[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 6 hours ago

The answer to your riddle is... Your dating your sister! Roll tide.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Wasn't he older than that? I saw some other article stating this was 2 years ago when he would have been 40...

[-] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Florida started investigating him for this crime, which occurred in 2016, in 2019. In 2021 the House Ethics Committee started investigating, but they paused because the justice department was already investigating.

It's a very confusing timeline

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 9 hours ago

So, we are going to have an actual child-fucker as AG.

Republicans, "the party of law and order".

🤣

Btw, if there is anyone that I would believe would feed on adrenochrome....just look at Gaetz. Sure, the adrenochrome thing is just rehashed antisemitic blood libel bullshit, but I could see Gaetz maybe trying it out to see....

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 7 hours ago

The pizza basements will become mandatory.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago

Do they come with pizza ovens? Regular ovens just don't get the dough hot enough for a good crust.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Hey, the President is an adjuducated rapist with 34 felony convictions, why should the AG be clean?

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

There are many credible accusations against Trump being a pedophile. So why would his AG be any different?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
472 points (99.8% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS