99
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by SanctimoniousApe to c/politics@lemmy.world

Frankly, I hope Elon wins this one. His handling of Twitter demonstrates his incompetence, and his inability to keep his mouth shut will be helpful in preparing to fight whatever BS they're up to next. The other guy might be too smart and sneaky considering his involvement in the fake elector scheme.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Brendan Carr has worked very hard to obstruct the passing and quality of Net Neutrality law. I guarantee it’ll be repealed again. Get ready for the return of data caps and content throttling.

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-397264A1.pdf

[-] Bluefruit@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

"This utility-style regulation will slow down rural broadband builds."

What a load of shit. As someone who lives in a rural part of Washington, can confirm that Comcast makes no fucking effort whatsoever to bring internet out here. They could give two fucks about building new lines and only care about dominating existing copper shit.

God this makes me so mad. Fuck these assholes for making the internet actively worse for consumers.

[-] SanctimoniousApe 17 points 1 month ago

What? You don't enjoy the prospect of having to pay significantly more for crappier satellite connections? Just another reason Elon is so involved - he wants to speed up the ROI for Starlink.

[-] SanctimoniousApe 12 points 1 month ago

Don't forget mutual agreements by major established ISPs not to encroach on each other's territory and actually have to *gasp* compete!

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Google tried to bring fiber to Phoenix, and we're mostly locked out by Cox.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The more infighting, the better. The more public they do it, the better. If everybody experiences their incompetence in a more impactful way, the better.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When you aren't choosing based on merit but on frivolous selfish whims, it's hard to all agree on the same person.

They are probably just fishing for our public opinion to see which ones feels more like they are "owning" us to us.

If it wasn't the literal scariest thing to happen in the real world in decades, Trumps presidency would feel spot on as a cartoonish caricature of an evil movie villain somehow tricking their way into presidency. Like if it was in a movie, you'd think "this isn't very believable, they could have at least put in some effort to make it convincing that this could actually happen instead of this cartoony slapstick bullshit in what was otherwise a serious movie"...

Every step of the way just seems like he is doing his best to get out of having to follow through with all the stuff he said by doing stuff so dumb that his followers will finally be disillusioned, but it keeps backfiring and making them like him even more. And it just keeps escalating...

But I know in reality he actually wants it, and is just pushing as quickly as he feels he can to pivot his audience towards his goals without losing them.

[-] SanctimoniousApe 3 points 1 month ago

He knows about the only thing he can do to lose them is side with a lib. He's not worried about losing them - especially now. He's more concerned with slash & burn revenge upon every last thing liberals have ever cared about. He doesn't GAF about anything else.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

So that's what Trump meant by "Fight! Fight! Fight!"

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
99 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2359 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS